Promoting the Integration of Public Perspective into Urban Design Decision-Making Based on Crowdsourced Visual Perception Method

  • Lu HUANG ,
  • Takuya (JPN) OKI , *
Expand
  • School of Environment and Society, Institute of Science Tokyo

HUANG Lu is a Ph.D. graduate in the School of Environment and Society, Institute of Science Tokyo. His research focuses on application of artificial intelligence and big data, urban computing, and spatial statistics

(JPN) OKI Takuya, D.Eng., is an associate professor and doctoral supervisor in the School of Environment and Society, Institute of Science Tokyo, and head of the OKI Lab. His research focuses on application of artificial intelligence and big data

Received date: 2024-12-05

  Revised date: 2025-03-19

  Online published: 2025-12-10

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Landscape Architecture. All rights reserved.

Abstract

[Objective] Cities, as the core carriers of human civilization, have spatial forms and physical environments that profoundly affect the quality of residents’ life and well-being. In micro-scale urban settings — such as streets and squares closely tied to daily life — interactions between people and urban spaces are most direct and frequent, with design quality directly determining residents’ comfort and convenience. Urban design, as a key practice in shaping these spaces, has evolved into a human-centered, participatory process of placemaking. However, in practice, time and cost constraints often lead decisions to overly rely on professional judgment, making it challenging to fully reflect public needs. Urban perception captures the public’s preferences for specific urban environments and their experiential feedback on spatial demands. Rooted in environmental psychology, this concept views human perception as a vital link in human-environment interactions, bridging spatial design and human experience while playing a central role in shaping urban environments. Among sensory modalities, visual perception stands out as the dominant dimension due to its primacy, making it a core focus of urban perception studies. Examining urban perception reveals authentic public needs — though lacking professional design expertise to propose specific solutions, the public’s sensory experiences and perceptual feedback effectively highlight real demands, providing critical input for design decisions. Thus, understanding and integrating public urban perception not only enhances design responsiveness to user needs but also fosters a harmonious balance of functional efficiency and humanistic care. Crowdsourced visual perception data and analysis methods, with their advantages of efficiency, broad representativeness, and low cost, have become key methodological tools in urban built environment research. However, existing research has yet to systematically explore how these methods effectively facilitate the integration of public perspectives into urban design decision-making, leaving their pathways and methodological efficacy in need of further refinement and synthesis. This research aims to dissect the pathways and efficacy features of crowdsourced visual perception methods, systematically uncovering the theoretical logic and mechanisms by which they promote public involvement in urban design decisions, thereby providing a scientifically robust and practical methodological foundation for human-centered urban design practices. [Methods] The research employs a case study approach, analyzing multiple urban research papers focused on Tokyo, Japan, that utilize crowdsourced visual perception methods. It systematically investigates how these methods, across key urban design decision-making stages — data collection, data analysis, and scheme generation — facilitate the deep integration of public perspectives into design decisions through specific pathways and mechanisms. The study particularly emphasizes micro-scale urban design. [Results] In the data collection phase, perception inference models trained with crowdsourced visual perception data and deep learning efficiently compute and evaluate perceptions of micro-scale urban scenes, offering designers an automated, low-cost means to gain insights into public perspectives early in a project. This approach addresses the limitations of traditional methods in data coverage and cost, significantly enhancing the breadth and representativeness of public perspectives in design decisions. From the perspective of integration, crowdsourcing breaks the traditional top-down data acquisition barrier, enabling ordinary citizens to indirectly contribute to the informational foundation of urban design by sharing individual perceptions. This shift not only increases data diversity and inclusivity but also empowers the public to express needs and preferences in the early stages of design decision-making. In the data analysis phase, statistical methods establish quantitative models linking built environment factors with visual perception evaluations, uncovering the interaction mechanisms between public preferences and built environment elements. These methods identify key factors significantly affecting visual perception and determine optimal parameter ranges for design interventions via regression analysis, providing a scientific basis for formulating design strategies and goals. Notably, nonlinear analysis methods capture complex relationships with greater precision. In the scheme generation phase, integrating crowdsourced perception data with generative AI transforms public perceptual preferences into intuitive, visualized design language, introducing a novel human-machine collaboration approach to urban design decision-making. The visualized outputs of AI-generated schemes offer a transparent and comprehensible negotiation basis for subsequent decisions, facilitating stakeholder interpretation and participation. Within this technology, the Stable Diffusion (SD) model outperforms GAN in generation quality, diversity, and flexibility. [Conclusion] The research uses visual perception as a lens to integrate public perspectives, exploring the role of crowdsourced visual perception in micro-scale urban design decision-making through detailed case studies. It systematically examines the pathways and mechanisms by which this approach embeds public input, highlighting its applicability, technical implementation, and inherent limitations. The findings offer a robust framework for incorporating public perspectives into micro-scale urban design decisions while laying a theoretical groundwork to advance the scientific rigor and inclusivity of the design decision-making process.

Cite this article

Lu HUANG , Takuya (JPN) OKI . Promoting the Integration of Public Perspective into Urban Design Decision-Making Based on Crowdsourced Visual Perception Method[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2025 , 32(5) : 22 -28 . DOI: 10.3724/j.fjyl.LA20240101

城市作为人类文明的核心载体,其空间形态与物质环境深刻影响着居民的生活质量与幸福感[1]。在微观尺度的城市环境中,如街道、广场等与居民日常生活紧密相关的空间,人与城市空间的互动最为直接且频繁,这些空间的设计品质直接决定了居民日常生活的舒适度与便利性[2]。城市设计作为塑造这些空间的关键实践,目前已转变为以人本导向和公众参与为核心的场所营造方法[3]。然而在实施过程中,因时间和成本限制,决策过程仍过度依赖专家判断,难以充分体现公众的真实需求[4]
城市感知反映了公众对特定城市环境的偏好、空间需求及体验反馈[5]。城市感知的概念源于环境心理学,该领域将城市感知视为人与环境互动的关键纽带,不仅连接空间设计与人类体验,还在塑造城市环境的过程中发挥核心作用[6]。具体而言,舒适且具有吸引力的空间往往会激发人们的探索与社交行为,而危险或衰败的氛围则可能会抑制人们对空间的利用[7]。在众多感官模式中,视觉感知因其主导地位尤为重要,成为城市感知研究的核心维度[8]。虽然公众缺乏专业设计知识,难以提出具体的设计方案,但公众的感官体验和感知反馈却能有效揭示真实需求,为设计决策提供重要依据[6]。因此,在城市设计决策中理解并整合公众的视觉感知,不仅能提升城市设计对公众需求的响应能力,更有助于实现城市功能、效率与人文关怀的有机统一[9]
传统城市视觉感知研究主要依赖小样本调查和专家评估,受限于样本规模和专家的主观性,难以全面反映微观城市尺度的复杂特征或客观呈现公众视角[10]。与此相比,众包方法则极大拓展了数据收集的广度。Amazon Mechanical Turk等在线众包平台的兴起进一步推动了这一领域的革新。这类平台和工具通过全球化的微任务分发机制,实现了多样化公众感知数据的系统性收集,使研究从传统的精英视角转向更具普适性的公众视角[11]。与此同时,城市图像大数据,如街景数据的出现为微观城市环境评估提供了丰富的数据源,而移动设备的普及则大幅降低了公众参与的门槛,使公众能够随时随地上传照片或填写问卷。此外,人工智能技术,尤其是计算机视觉和深度学习技术的应用,为解析和扩充众包视觉感知数据提供了强大工具。通过学习数据中的规律,人工智能技术能够构建感知预测模型,从而为高效、精准地分析公众视觉感知提供先进的技术支持[12-13]
众包视觉感知数据及分析方法因高效性、代表性和低成本优势,已成为城市建成环境研究的重要工具。然而,现有研究尚未系统探索众包视觉感知方法如何有效促进公众视角融入城市设计决策的过程。本研究旨在通过剖析众包视觉感知方法的作用路径及效能特征,系统揭示其推动公众视角融入城市设计决策的理论逻辑与作用机制,从而为人本导向的城市设计实践提供兼具科学性与操作性的方法论支撑。

1 文献综述

1.1 众包视觉感知方法在建成环境研究中的应用

城市视觉感知数据往往依赖访谈、问卷、现场审计和实验等方法获取[14-15]。这些方法通过开放性问题或评分量表评估环境质量,虽在科学决策中价值显著,但因成本高、耗时长、样本量受限,导致代表性不足,影响结果的普适性[16]。21世纪初,以谷歌街景和百度街景为代表的街景图像平台重塑了数据收集与分析方法[17-18]。研究者通过专家评审或众包平台实现对城市空间的虚拟审查[19],显著降低了微观城市场景的评估门槛并拓展了研究范围。然而,基于人工的微观城市空间虚拟审查在处理效率和规模化方面仍受限,难以充分利用海量街景数据的潜力。人工智能技术的快速发展为自动化视觉感知分析带来革命性机遇。研究者能够基于有限样本数据训练视觉感知预测模型,进而实现对更大规模的视觉感知数据的自动化推断[20]。如麻省理工学院(Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT)的Place Pulse项目通过构建在线图像对比实验平台,以随机配对的街景图片组为展示数据,结合“哪一场景更安全?”等结构化问题,系统性收集了公众对城市街景特定感知维度的数据,构建了可量化分析的大规模空间感知数据集。基于该项目构建的感知数据集,Naik等[12]通过机器学习回归算法构建了一个针对安全性感知得分的预测模型。Dubey等[13]提出了一种基于卷积神经网络(convolutional neural network, CNN)架构的视觉感知预测模型。此类视觉感知推理方法已广泛应用于不同城市街道安全性、舒适性、可步行性及可玩性等主观感知指标的大规模评估[11, 21-24]。此外,一些研究通过聚类或降维技术,进一步挖掘基于环境感知的城市空间模式[22-23]。随着基于众包方法和深度学习技术的感知测度方法被认可,越来越多的城市研究者利用该方法探索公众视觉感知与建成环境要素的关系,为理解感知形成机制提供了坚实证据。已有研究多聚焦于建成环境,尤其是微观建成环境要素对视觉感知的影响,例如Huang等[25]和Liu等[26]利用机器学习技术分析了街景要素对居民视觉感知的影响。除建成环境要素外,相关研究还关注人口学属性[27]、天气及昼夜差异[28]等变量对公众视觉感知的作用或调节效应。同时,众包视觉感知方法还被用于推测和分析城市地价[29]、犯罪率[30]、城市开发潜力[31]及人类流动行为[32],拓展了该方法的应用领域。随着生成式人工智能技术的发展,众包视觉感知方法与生成对抗网络(generative adversarial networks, GAN)[33-34] 或稳定扩散(Stable Diffusion, SD)模型[35]的结合显著提升了其在城市设计实践中的应用潜力,设计师可据此生成更契合公众需求的设计方案。

1.2 城市设计决策与公众视角

公众视角在城市设计决策中至关重要,它能反映真实需求,有助于提升方案的合理性与可行性,增强社会包容性,促进市民的归属感与责任感,减少决策失误,推动城市治理的民主化与可持续发展,能够将民主意见融入少数人做出的影响多数人的决策[36]。众包视觉感知方法作为将公众视角融入城市设计决策的关键工具,借助环境心理学的理论框架,量化公众对城市空间的感官体验与情感反馈,为设计决策提供具体且可操作的数据支持[9, 37]。这种数据驱动的方法将公众视角从抽象理念转化为科学的决策依据,使设计更具精准性与人本导向[6]。然而,在空间规划与设计中融入公众感知仍面临诸多挑战,包括信息收集手段的局限性、沟通渠道的单向性、专业知识与公众理解之间的差距、时间以及资源的制约,导致公众意见难以被有效收集与整合[38]。与此同时,现有研究表明,新兴的技术和方法如人工智能、众包方法及城市大数据的快速发展为克服这些挑战提供了技术手段[12, 39-40]

2 基于众包视觉感知方法的城市设计决策支持

本研究聚焦微观尺度的城市设计问题,选取5篇基于众包视觉感知方法的城市设计文献作为研究案例,系统考察众包视觉感知方法在城市设计决策关键环节(包括数据收集、数据分析和方案生成)中的作用机制,揭示其如何促进公众视角融入城市设计决策。

2.1 自动化收集公众视觉感知数据

Oki等[22]利用谷歌街景数据和众包视觉感知预测方法,对东京高密度木构居住区的环境进行了大规模量化评估。该研究构建了一个包含22个视觉感知指标的评估体系,涵盖“舒适的”“有年代感的”“压抑的”等指标,用于全面捕捉公众对高密度居住环境的感知特征。该研究选取了1 000张具有代表性的高密度木构居住区街景图像,随机配对生成10 000组图像对比样本。在数据收集方面,研究团队与日本专业调研公司合作,开发了基于众包方法的移动端在线调查平台,并采用图像比较法收集反馈。例如,通过提问参与者“哪个场景看起来更具年代感?”等问题,获取感知评价结果。为确保样本的代表性,该研究控制了参与者的性别和年龄分布,共邀请14 900名日本居民参与,在两周内收集到110 000份有效问卷,平均每位居民回答7.4次问卷。
为实现批量化和自动化的公众感知计算,该研究构建了一个基于深度卷积神经网络(deep convolutional neural networks, DCNN)的感知推理模型(图1)。感知推理模型训练以众包方法获取的图像比较问卷结果及对应的图像特征作为训练数据,具体步骤为利用ImageNet预训练的VGG16模型提取街景图像特征;通过孪生网络(siamese network)分析每组对比样本中2张街景图像的特征,计算差异并利用Sigmoid函数转化为概率以表征感知程度[22]。训练完成后的模型能够基于输入的街景图像对22个视觉感知指标进行自动量化打分。
图1 基于DCNN的视觉感知推理模型[22]

Fig. 1 A visual perception reasoning model based on DCNN[22]

该研究对东京高密度木构居住区22个感知指标的量化评估情况进行可视化分析(图2),直观呈现了公众城市感知的多维特征及区域差异,为基于公众视角的城市设计提供了数据支撑。
图2 东京高密度木构居住区22个视觉感知指标的推理得分[22]

Fig. 2 Inference results of the 22 visual perception indicators of the high-density wooden residential areas in Tokyo[22]

此外,该研究基于22个视觉感知指标,采用层次聚类分析方法将20个东京高密度木构居住区归纳为3个特征鲜明的聚类群组(图3)。分析显示聚类群组1在积极感知指标上表现优异,表明这些区域内存在优质的空间环境;聚类群组2呈现有人气但安全性低的二元特征,折射出历史街区向现代转型的矛盾;聚类群组3则以消极感知为主导,反映空间的消极现状[22]。这一聚类分析不仅实现了多维感知数据的降维与可视化,更重要的是通过空间认知的量化分区,为基于场所特性的设计策略制定提供了依据。
图3 基于众包视觉感知方法的东京高密度木构居住区层次聚类分析[22]

Fig. 3 Hierarchical clustering analysis of the high-density wooden residential areas in Tokyo based on crowdsourced visual perception method[22]

该研究通过融合DCNN技术与众包视觉感知方法实现了对城市微观尺度的大规模视觉感知数据进行高效、精准量化,突破了传统方法在时间、成本及样本量上的限制,为设计初期公众视角的数据收集提供了重要支撑。该研究的核心价值不仅在于揭示“公众如何感知城市环境”这一认知机制,更在于为城市空间优化决策提供了精细化的量化依据。然而,该研究存在2个方面的局限性:1)静态街景图像感知数据的收集方式可能导致感知测量结果与真实空间体验之间存在一定差异,这种脱节可能影响研究结果的准确性;2)数据来源主要依赖以车行道视角为主的谷歌街景图像,缺乏人行道视角,这导致在捕捉公众真实感知体验方面可能产生偏差。

2.2 科学分析公众视觉感知方法的作用机制

2.2.1 基于线性回归的公众视觉感知影响因素分析

Harada等[28]的研究构建了一个考虑天气和时间情境差异的城市视觉感知分析框架。该研究通过骑行采集的方式,获取了不同天气和时段的街景图像。基于这些图像,该研究基于众包平台在线调查来收集公众感知评价,并训练感知推理模型对所有街景图像进行感知评分。同时,采用语义分割模型量化了建筑、车道、人行道、绿植等要素的视觉占比。通过Lasso线性回归分析,识别出显著影响公众视觉感知的关键建成环境要素,并统计了这些要素在不同天气和时间条件下与不同视觉感知指标的相关系数及作用方向。这些分析结果为制定适应不同情境的城市设计目标和策略提供了量化依据。

2.2.2 街景要素对步行感知的非线性影响

Huang等[25]采用极端提升梯度(extreme gradient boosting, XGBoost)回归模型揭示了步行感知与东京街景要素之间的非线性关系。研究发现,街景要素对步行感知的影响呈现阈值效应:以沿街乔木为例,其对于步行感知的正向效应随绿视率提升而增加,但当绿视率超过约30%的阈值后,边际效应出现,正向效应出现显著递减趋势。这种非线性关系的识别为后续制定合理的建成环境优化策略提供了精准的量化依据,如确定最优绿化视觉配置比例。
以上2个基于回归分析的研究案例表明,将视觉感知作为变量纳入关系模型,可揭示公众如何组织、解读并回应外部信息[41]。这种量化分析方法通过建立感知指标与物质环境要素的统计关联,为城市设计决策提供了2个维度的科学支撑:1)城市要素设计维度(如增加绿化率或人行道面积);2)设计目标与可行性约束维度(如舒适度阈值或实施成本)。然而,通过统计分析方法解读视觉感知与建成环境或其他要素之间的关系,其价值在于为设计目标和策略制定提供公众视角的科学依据,而非取代设计过程,最终方案的生成仍需融合设计师的主观判断与实践经验。

2.3 自动生成契合公众感知的设计方案

2.3.1 基于 GAN的设计方案生成

Yamanaka等[34]开发了一种基于GAN模型的街道环境优化框架,通过整合CycleGAN和VAEGAN模型实现了从众包视觉感知数据到设计方案的有效转化。该方法首先利用CycleGAN模型进行图像风格转换以调整特定街道特征,再通过VAEGAN模型提取高质量潜在变量来克服传统方法的模糊性问题,最终生成融合公众感知的优化设计方案。该研究将众包视觉数据转化为可操作的设计参数,为街道更新提供了直观的参考。该研究的3个测试生成场景展示了街道环境优化前后的显著差异(图4),同时通过训练后的视觉感知预测模型验证了生成方案在提升公众视觉感知方面的有效性。
图4 基于众包视觉感知数据和GAN模型的街道场景优化和评估[34]

Fig. 4 Optimization and evaluation of street scenes based on crowdsourced visual perception data and GAN model[34]

然而,基于GAN的方法仍面临挑战。首先,GAN模型训练过程复杂且依赖大量高质量训练数据,对数据采集和计算资源要求较高;其次,生成图像的真实性需进一步提升,尤其在细节和场景一致性方面,难以完全满足实际设计需求;最后,模型对输出结果的控制力有限,缺乏针对特定设计目标的精准调节能力。

2.3.2 基于 SD模型的设计方案生成

Huang等[35]针对GAN的局限性,整合了众包视觉感知数据与SD模型,构建了以公众步行感知为导向的步行友好型街道自动优化设计方法。该方法基于众包视觉感知数据训练感知预测模型来量化公众步行感知,并构建高质量训练数据集。然而,为解决SD模型直接训练的高计算成本难题,该研究采用低秩适应(low-rank adaptation, LoRA)技术对SD模型进行高效微调,在参数量增加有限的情况下优化设计方案生成效果。相较于GAN模型,基于SD模型的方法在设计方案生成效率、精度、可控性及适应性方面展现出明显优势。基于该方法生成的设计方案能有效提升街道的安全感、舒适感、兴趣感、通过意愿、停留意愿5个步行感知关键指标(图5),证实了该方法在步行友好型街道自动优化设计中的实用价值。
图5 基于众包视觉感知数据和SD模型的街道场景优化和评估[35]

Fig. 5 Optimization and evaluation of street scenes based on crowdsourced visual perception data and SD model[35]

基于众包视觉感知数据训练的生成式人工智能模型为城市设计决策的方案生成阶段提供了一种新型人机协同手段。该手段通过解码公众需求特征,自动寻找最佳设计策略,生成契合公众感知偏好的概念设计方案。这种人机协同的生成机制通过突破专家经验的认知局限产生创新性解决方案,同时其高效迭代特性显著提升了设计效率。此外,基于生成式人工智能模型生成的设计方案的可视化特征为城市设计决策提供了透明且易理解的协商基础,便于利益相关者解读与参与决策过程[42]。然而,生成式人工智能模型的“黑箱”特性仍是一大制约,难以阐明感知优化方案生成过程的内在机制[43]

3 结论与展望

本研究以视觉感知作为公众视角的切入点,通过具体研究案例剖析了众包视觉感知方法在促进公众视角融入城市设计决策关键环节的具体方法。研究成果不仅为公众视角融入微观尺度城市设计决策提供了可靠的范式,还为提升设计决策过程的科学性与包容性奠定了理论基础。
在数据收集阶段,利用众包视觉感知数据和DCNN技术训练的感知推理模型能够对微观城市场景的视觉感知进行高效计算,为设计人员在项目初期洞察公众需求提供自动化、低成本的途径。该方法弥补了传统感知调查手段在数据覆盖范围和成本上的局限性,显著提升了设计决策中公众视角的广度与代表性。从公众视角融合程度看,众包方法打破了传统自上而下获取数据的壁垒,使普通市民通过贡献个体感知,间接参与到城市设计的信息基础构建中。这种模式的转变,不仅增强了数据的多样性与包容性,还赋予了公众在城市设计决策早期阶段表达需求与偏好的主动权。在数据分析阶段,基于统计分析方法建立建成环境要素与公众视觉感知之间的量化关系模型,揭示公众偏好与建成环境要素之间的相互作用机制。统计分析方法不仅能够识别出对视觉感知具有显著影响的关键要素,还能确定实施设计干预的最佳参数范围,从而为制定科学的设计干预策略和设计目标提供依据。其中,非线性的分析方法能够更加细致地捕捉复杂关系。在方案生成阶段,基于众包视觉感知数据训练的生成式人工智能模型将公众感知偏好自动转换为直观且可视化的设计语言,为城市设计决策提供了一种新型人机协同手段。同时,生成式人工智能模型生成的可视化设计方案为多方协商提供了基础,其透明的表现形式降低了决策参与门槛,促进了利益相关者的有效参与。在此类技术中,基于SD模型的方法在方案生成质量、多样性、灵活性及可控性方面相较于基于GAN的方法展现出更卓越的性能。
然而,城市设计决策是一项复杂任务,涉及空间、社会、经济和环境等多维目标的权衡,同时需协调政府、开发商、设计团队及公众等多元利益相关者的需求与意见[44]。本研究仅聚焦公众视角,未来研究应致力于构建综合决策框架,有效整合多方视角并优化决策过程。
此外,针对现有研究的局限性和面临的挑战,未来研究可以从以下方面进行优化。首先,当前基于众包视觉感知数据的城市感知相关研究依赖静态街景图像,难以全面捕捉动态的多感官体验及场景变化的影响,导致评估结果可能偏离真实情况,未来可通过获取多模态数据源(如声音、气味、温度等),结合数字孪生或虚拟现实技术,构建沉浸式感知环境。这种环境不仅能够提升数据采集的真实性与多维性,还可利用交互式平台使公众能够在虚拟场景中实时反馈意见,从而增强公众视角的动态表达和参与深度。其次,现有街景数据主要基于车行道视角,难以捕捉行人体验的细微差异。相比之下,一种通过志愿者自己拍照并上传构建的街景数据集(volunteered street view imagery, VSVI),如Mapillary数据集提供了行人和骑行者的视角,能够有效弥补传统数据的不足。最后,生成式人工智能模型虽能直观呈现公众视角,但其“黑箱”特性削弱了结果的透明度与可信度,可能引发公众对决策公正性的质疑,未来需结合可解释性研究,公开算法逻辑与数据来源,以提升技术透明度和公众信任度。

图1~3由作者根据参考文献[22]绘制;图4由作者根据参考文献[34]绘制;图5由作者根据参考文献[35]绘制。

[1]
甄峰, 席广亮, 张姗琪, 等. 智慧城市人地系统理论框架与科学问题[J]. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(9): 2187-2200.

DOI

ZHEN F, XI G L, ZHANG S Q, et al. Theoretical Framework and Scientific Problems of Smart City Man-Land System[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(9): 2187-2200.

DOI

[2]
SUN Z, BELL S, SCOTT I, et al. Everyday Use of Urban Street Spaces: The Spatio-Temporal Relations Between Pedestrians and Street Vendors: A Case Study in Yuncheng, China[J]. Landscape Research, 2020, 45(3): 292-309.

DOI

[3]
PANAGOULIA E. Human-Centered Approaches in Urban Analytics and Placemaking[J]. Sustainability in Urban Planning and Design, 2020: 149.

[4]
WANG Y, LIN Y. Public Participation in Urban Design with Augmented Reality Technology Based on Indicator Evaluation[J]. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2023, 4: 1071355

DOI

[5]
WRONKOWSKI A. Exploring User Needs in Urban Plazas: An Empirical Mixed-Method Analysis Bulletin of Geography: Socio-economic Series, 2024(65): 67-84.

[6]
NASAR J L. Perception, Cognition, and Evaluation of Urban Places[M]. Boston: Springer, 1989: 31-56.

[7]
MILIAS V, SHARIFI NOORIAN S, BOZZON A, et al. Is It Safe to Be Attractive? Disentangling the Influence of Streetscape Features on the Perceived Safety and Attractiveness of City Streets[J]. AGILE: GIScience Series, 2023, 4: 8

[8]
HUANG A S, LIN Y J. The Effect of Landscape Colour, Complexity and Preference on Viewing Behaviour[J]. Landscape Research, 2020, 45(2): 214-227.

DOI

[9]
EWING R, HANDY S. Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability[J]. Journal of Urban Design, 2009, 14(1): 65-84.

DOI

[10]
XU X, QIU W, LI W, et al. Associations Between Street-View Perceptions and Housing Prices: Subjective Vs. Objective Measures Using Computer Vision and Machine Learning Techniques[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(4): 891

DOI

[11]
KRUSE J, KANG Y, LIU Y N, et al. Places for Play: Understanding Human Perception of Playability in Cities Using Street View Images and Deep Learning[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2021, 90: 101693

DOI

[12]
NAIK N, PHILIPOOM J, RASKAR R, et al. Streetscore: Predicting the Perceived Safety of One Million Streetscapes[C]//IEEE Xplore. 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Columbus: CVPR, 2014: 793-799.

[13]
DUBEY A, NAIK N, PARIKH D, et al. Deep Learning the City: Quantifying Urban Perception at a Global Scale[C]//LEIBE B. Computer Vision: ECCV 2016. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016: 196-212.

[14]
MOORE G, CROXFORD B, ADAMS M, et al. Urban Environmental Quality: Perceptions and Measures in Three UK Cities[C]//MANDER U. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. Tallin: WIT Press, 2006: 785-794.

[15]
GRIEW P, HILLSDON M, FOSTER C, et al. Developing and Testing a Street Audit Tool Using Google Street View to Measure Environmental Supportiveness for Physical Activity[J]. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2013, 10: 103

DOI

[16]
ITO K, KANG Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Understanding Urban Perception with Visual Data: A Systematic Review[J]. Cities, 2024, 152: 105169

DOI

[17]
KELLY C M, WILSON J S, BAKER E A, et al. Using Google Street View to Audit the Built Environment: Inter-Rater Reliability Results[J]. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2013, 45(S1): 108-112.

DOI

[18]
HWANG J, SAMPSON R J. Divergent Pathways of Gentrification[J]. American Sociological Review, 2014, 79(4): 726-751.

DOI

[19]
QUERCIA D, O’HARE N K, CRAMER H. Aesthetic Capital: What Makes London Look Beautiful, Quiet, and Happy? [C]// FUSSELL S. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. Baltimore: ACM, 2014: 945-955.

[20]
ORDONEZ V, BERG T L. Learning High-Level Judgments of Urban Perception[C]//FLEET D. Computer Vision: ECCV 2014. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014: 494-510.

[21]
ZHANG F, ZHOU B, LIU L, et al. Measuring Human Perceptions of a Large-Scale Urban Region Using Machine Learning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 180: 148-160.

DOI

[22]
OKI T, KIZAWA S. Model for Evaluating Impression of Streets in Residential Areas Based on Image Big Data and a Large Questionnaire Survey[J]. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 2022, 87: 2102-2133.

DOI

[23]
OGAWA Y, OKI T, ZHAO C, et al. Evaluating the Subjective Perceptions of Streetscapes Using Street-View Images[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2024, 247: 105073

DOI

[24]
IMADEGAWA Y, OKI T, OGAWA Y, et al. Predicting Impression Evaluation of Building Exterior Appearance Using Street Image Big Data and Deep Learning[C]//IEEE Xplore. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data. Sorrento: IEEE, 2023: 1419-1428.

[25]
HUANG L, OKI T, MUTO S, et al. Unveiling the Non-linear Influence of Eye-Level Streetscape Factors on Walking Preference: Evidence from Tokyo[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2024, 13(4): 131

DOI

[26]
LIU Y, CHEN M, WANG M, et al. An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Measuring Urban Perceptions from Panoramic Street View Images[J]. iScience, 2023, 26(3): 106132

DOI

[27]
OKI T, OGAWA Y, ZHAO C. Urban Impressions Evaluation and Its Age and Gender Differences: Application of the Urban Impressions Evaluation Model[C]//GISA. Proceedings of the 30th Conference of Man-Environment Research Association. Okinawa: GISA, 2023.

[28]
HARADA K, OKI T. Modelling the Effects of Weather and Time of Day on People’s Subjective Evaluation of Street Impressions[C]//JSAI. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence. Kumamoto: JSAI, 2023.

[29]
ZHAO C, OGAWA Y, CHEN S, et al. Quantitative Land Price Analysis via Computer Vision from Street View Images[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 123: 106294

DOI

[30]
ZHANG F, FAN Z, KANG Y, et al. “Perception Bias”: Deciphering a Mismatch Between Urban Crime and Perception of Safety[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2021, 207: 104003

DOI

[31]
HE J, ZHANG J, YAO Y, et al. Extracting Human Perceptions from Street View Images for Better Assessing Urban Renewal Potential[J]. Cities, 2023, 134: 104189

DOI

[32]
ZHAO C, OGAWA Y, CHEN S, et al. People Flow Trend Estimation Approach and Quantitative Explanation Based on the Scene Level Deep Learning of Street View Images[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(5): 1362

DOI

[33]
JOGLEKAR S, QUERCIA D, REDI M, et al. FaceLift: A Transparent Deep Learning Framework to Beautify Urban Scenes[J]. Royal Society Open Science, 2020, 7(1): 190987

DOI

[34]
YAMANAKA R, OKI T. Development of a Simulation Method Capable of Integratively Predicting Changes in Street Landscape Images and Impression Evaluation Values[C]// JSAI. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Artificial Intelligence Society of Japan. Kyoto: JSAI, 2022.

[35]
HUANG L, OKI T. Enhancing People’s Walking Preferences in Street Design Through Generative Artificial Intelligence and Crowdsourcing Surveys: The Case of Tokyo[J]. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2025: 23998083251327405.

[36]
RIJAL S. The Importance of Community Involvement in Public Management Planning and Decision-making Processes[J]. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 2023, 1(2): 84-92.

DOI

[37]
GIFFORD R. Environmental Psychology Matters[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2014, 65: 541-579.

DOI

[38]
RYAN R L. The Social Landscape of Planning: Integrating Social and Perceptual Research with Spatial Planning Information[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 100(4): 361-363.

DOI

[39]
GOODSPEED R. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(4), 318-319.

[40]
BRABHAM D C. Crowdsourcing in the Public Sector[M]. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2015.

[41]
MA L, CAO J. How Perceptions Mediate the Effects of the Built Environment on Travel Behavior?[J]. Transportation, 2019, 46(1): 175-197.

DOI

[42]
JIANG F, MA J, WEBSTER C J, et al. Generative Urban Design: A Systematic Review on Problem Formulation, Design Generation, and Decision-Making[J]. Progress in Planning, 2024, 180: 100795

DOI

[43]
GUPTA S. Agency, Trust, and Interpretability of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)[D]. Raleigh: North Carolina State University, 2021.

[44]
RITTEL H W J, WEBBER M M. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning[J]. Policy Sciences, 1973, 4(2): 155-169.

DOI

Outlines

/