城市研究

第三空间视域下历史街区的日常生活实践与地方依恋——以天津市鼓楼街区为例

展开
  • 1.南开大学 文学院,天津 300071; 2.新加坡国立大学 设计与环境学院,新加坡 117566
管永康(1996-),男,河南濮阳市人,博士研究生,主要从事空间人文与城市遗产保护研究,(E-mail)yongkang.guan@mail.nankai.edu.cn。

网络出版日期: 2024-06-25

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重大项目(16ZDA158);国家留学基金委公派联合培养博士生项目(202206200061);天津市研究生科研创新项目(2021YJSB011)

Everyday Life Practices and Place Attachment in the Historic Districts under the Perspective of Third Space: A Case Study of Tianjin Gulou District

Expand
  • 1.School of Literature, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China; 2.College of Design and Enivronment, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117566, Singapore

Online published: 2024-06-25

摘要

在第三空间理论的视域下,以天津市鼓楼街区为研究对象,采用质性与量性相结合的研究方法,分析街区更新中的日常生活实践和地方依恋成因。结果表明:(1)在城市发展联盟“净化-置换”的战略方法下,历史街区的空间表征呈现出肌理再造、功能替换和文化转换3种特征转向。(2)居民们通过“占据-迂回”的战术方法,对抗精英集团的空间介入,呈现出能动性与韧性的特征,但其力量是微小且有限的。(3)非物质层面的情感、认同与纽带是地方依恋产生的直接表征,且与年龄呈显著正相关性。(4)空间剥夺、空间失配和空间隔离所引发的日常生活问题是居民地方依恋产生的主要原因。“污名化”的身份标签与“阶层化”的社会关系不利于居民日常生活的重建。

本文引用格式

管永康, 薛义 . 第三空间视域下历史街区的日常生活实践与地方依恋——以天津市鼓楼街区为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2023 , 42(3) : 92 -97 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2023.03.015

Abstract

Taking the Tianjin Gulou District as the research object, this study analyses everyday life practices and place attachment in urban regeneration by adopting a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods. The results show that: (1) Under the purification-replacement strategy of the urban development alliance, the spatial representation of the historic districts show three characteristic shifts, including texture reconstruction, functional replacement, and cultural transformation. (2) The residents have fought against the spatial intervention of the elite group through the tactical method of occupancy-meandering, showing the characteristics of mobility and resilience, but their power is small and limited. (3) After relocation, residents have a strong sense of place attachment to the Gulou District, with non-material aspects of emotion, identity, and bonding is the direct manifestation of place attachment and a significant positive correlation with age. (4) Spatial deprivation, spatial mismatch, and spatial segregation are the main causes of place attachment among residents.

参考文献

[1]ROMANO G C.Changing Urban Renewal Policies in China:Policy Transfer and Policy Learning under Multiple Hierarchies[M].Cham:Palgrave Macmillan Cham,2020.
[2]朱喜钢,周强,金俭.城市绅士化与城市更新:以南京为例[J].城市发展研究,2004(4):33-37.
[3]SOJA E W.Thirdspace:Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Realandimagined Places[M].Oxford:Blackwell,1996.
[4]张志庆,刘佳丽.爱德华·索亚第三空间理论的渊源与启示[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2019,41(12):14-20.
[5]范瑛.城市空间批判:从马克思主义到新马克思主义[J].政治经济学评论,2013,4(1):181-193.
[6]胡小武,何平.从“绅士化”到“超级绅士化”:大城市中心城区空间更新“奢侈化”趋势研究[J].河北学刊,2021,41(2):190-197.
[7]谢富胜,巩潇然.资本积累驱动下不同尺度地理空间的不平衡发展:史密斯马克思主义空间理论探讨[J].地理学报,2018,73(8):1407-1420.
[8]李秀玲.空间正义理论的基础与建构:试析爱德华·索亚的空间正义思想[J].马克思主义与现实,2014(3):75-81.
[9]包蓉,罗小龙,吉玫成,等.解读权力变迁下的新城空间生产:以南京市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2015,34(1):60-64.
[10]侯斌英.去往真实的和想象的空间的旅程:析爱德华·苏贾的“第三空间”理论[J].新疆大学学报(哲学·人文社会科学版),2010,38(2):109-113.
[11]谢峰,明庆忠,侯兵.居民感知视角下遗产地旅游空间生产研究:以江苏省无锡市南长街为例[J].地域研究与开发,2022,41(4):131-136.
[12]林铭亮,高川秀,林元城,等.旅游地品牌化:唐诗“第三空间”的旅游体验与地方想象的建构[J].旅游学刊,2020,35(5):98-107.
[13]高慧智.第三空间视角下非正规空间的生产逻辑与治理应对:对义乌“四层半”的实证研究[J].规划师,2021,37(17):74-79.
[14]LEFEBVRE H.The Production of Space[M].Oxford:Blackwell,1991.
[15]WILSON J.“The Devastating Conquest of the Lived by the Conceived”:The Concept of Abstract Space in the Work of Henri Lefebvre[J].Space and Culture,2013,16(3):364-380.
[16]CERTEAU M.The Practice of Everyday Life[M].London:University of Minnesota Press,1998.
[17]FOUCAULT M.Discipline and Punish:The Birth of the Prison[M].New York:Vintage,1977.
[18]段义孚.恋地情结[M].志丞,刘苏,译.北京:商务印书馆,2019.
[19]WILLIAMS D R,PATTERSON M E,ROGGENBUCK J W,et al.Beyond the Commodity Metaphor:Examining Emotional and Symbolic Attachment to Place[J].Leisure Sciences,1992,14(1):29-46.
[20]WILLIAMS D R,VASKE J J.The Measurement of Place Attachment:Validity and Generalizability of a Psychometric Approach[J].Forest Science,2003,49(6):830-840.
[21]KYLE G,GRAEFE A,MANNING R.Testing the Dimensionality of Place Attachment in Recreational Settings[J].Environment and Behavior,2005,37(2):153-177.
[22]李志飞,聂心怡.文化旅游地集体记忆对游客地方依恋的作用机理:以乌镇、平遥古城和凤凰古城为例[J].地域研究与开发,2018,37(3):95-100.
[23]王雪,青木信夫,徐苏斌.基于地方依恋反思旧城更新语境下的失所现象:以天津西沽南拆除计划为例[J].人文地理,2019,34(5):44-52.
[24]ZHANG J,XU S,AOKI N.Contradictions of Indigenous Cognition and Heritage Evaluation under Political Transformations in a Workingclass Community in Tianjin,China[J].Cities,2023,132:1-15.
[25]HARVEY D.Social Justice and the City[M].Georgia:University of Georgia Press,2010.
[26]TOWNSEND P.Deprivation[J].Journal of Social Policy,1987,16(2):125-146.
[27]LANGLOIS A.Identifying and Measuring Dimensions of Urban Deprivation in Montreal:An Analysis of the 1996 Census Data[J].Urban Studies,2001,38(1):119-139.
[28]KAIN J.Housing Segregation,Negro Employment,and Metropolitan Decentralization[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1968,82(2):175-197.
[29]SCHWAB W A.Urban Sociology:A Human Ecological Perspective[M].Reading,Mass.:AddisonWesley Publishing Company,1982:6-7.
Options
文章导航

/