EN中文

地域研究与开发 >

2023 , Vol. 42 >Issue 3: 129 - 134,141

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2023.03.021

旅游研究

河南省4A级及以上景区公路交通可达性研究

展开
  • 1.开封大学 财政经济学院，河南 开封 475000； 2.郑州大学 信息管理学院，郑州 450001
杨利峰（1986- ），女，河南许昌市人，讲师，硕士，主要从事区域经济研究，（E-mail）yanglifeng2012@126.com。

网络出版日期: 2024-06-25

基金资助

河南省高校人文社会科学研究一般项目（2023-ZZJH-192）

收起

Research on Driveway Traffic Accessibility of 4A-level and above Scenic Spots in Henan Province

Expand
  • 1.School of Finance and Economics, Kaifeng University, Kaifeng 475000, China；2.School of Information Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Online published: 2024-06-25

Fold

摘要

“互联网+”时代的来临，为旅游业提供了新的发展机遇，在“互联网+旅游”背景下，旅游交通等方面需要进行创新与变革，从而提升景区的可达性，推动旅游业的发展。以河南208个4A级及以上景区、122个城镇为例，利用K密度估计、可达性模型和百度地图导航功能，对景区前往城镇的公路交通可达性进行研究。结果表明：（1）景区的空间分布存在区域差异，平均通行时间3 h以内的景区占38.94%，5 h以内的占97.60%，中短途观光旅游和周末度假游具有明显优势。（2）景区的可达性呈现“核心-外围”圈层结构，省内旅游便捷的景区位于郑州、开封、许昌、漯河等地，地理位置、交通条件和客源地市场对景区开发市场影响较大。（3）山区公路交通路网有待提升，省内公路交通连结性有待进一步增强。相比理论性的研究方法，利用互联网和大数据，通行时间更为真实。将人口数量作为影响交通可达性的重要因素，对于开发客源地市场、调配旅游交通负荷具有一定参考价值。 

关键词： 互联网+旅游；景区；公路交通；可达性；河南省

本文引用格式

杨利峰, 高晓宁 . 河南省4A级及以上景区公路交通可达性研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2023 , 42(3) : 129 -134,141 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2023.03.021

Abstract

The advent of the “Internet +” era provides new opportunities for the development of tourism. Under the background of “Internet + Tourism”, innovation and reform are needed in tourism transportation so as to improve the accessibility of scenic spots and promote the development of tourism. Taking 208 scenic spots above 4A-level and 122 towns in Henan Province as examples, this paper uses K density estimation, the accessibility model, and Baidu map navigation function to study the road traffic accessibility of scenic spots to towns. The results show that: (1) There are regional differences in the spatial distribution of scenic spots. 38.94% of the scenic spots have an average travel time of less than 3 hours, and 97.60% of the scenic spots are within 5 hours. The short- and medium-distance sightseeing tours and weekend vacation tours have obvious advantages. (2) The accessibility of the scenic spot presents a “core-peripheral” circle structure. The scenic spots with convenient tourism in Henan Province are located in Zhengzhou, Kaifeng, Xuchang and Luohe. Geographic location, transportation conditions, and customer source market have a greater impact on the market development of scenic spots.(3) The driveway traffic network in mountainous areas needs to be improved, and the connectivity of driveway traffic in Henan Province needs to be further enhanced. Compared with theoretical research methods, this paper uses the Internet and Big Data to make the travel time more realistic. Taking population as an important factor affecting traffic accessibility has certain reference value for developing tourist source market and allocating tourist traffic load.

Key words： Internet + Tourism; scenic spots; driveway traffic; accessibility; Henan Province

参考文献

［1］杨仲元,卢松.交通发展对区域旅游空间结构的影响研究:以皖南旅游区为例［J］.地理科学,2013,33(7):806-814.
［2］HANSEN W G.How Accessibility Shapes Land-use［J］.Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1959,25(2):73-76.
［3］INGRAM D R.The Concept of Accessibility:A Search for an Operational Form［J］.Regional Studies,1971,5(2):101-107.
［4］CASCETTA E,CARTENI A,HENKE I L,et al.Economic Growth,Transport Accessibility and Regional Equity Impacts of High-speed Railways in Italy:Ten Years ex post Evaluation and Future Perspectives［J］.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,2020,139:412-428.
［5］ROSA D L.Accessibility to Greenspaces:GIS Based Indicators for Sustainable Planning in a Dense Urban Context［J］.Ecological Indicators,2014,42(1):122-134.
［6］ANTOGNELLI A,VIZZARI M.Landscape Liveability Spatial Assessment Integrating Ecosystem and Urban Services with Their Perceived Importance by Stakeholders［J］.Ecological Indicators,2017,72(1):703-725.
［7］GEURS K T,WEE B V.Accessibility Evaluation of Land-use and Transport Strategies:Review and Research Directions［J］.Journal of Transport Geography,2003,12(2):127-140.
［8］WIDENER M J,FARBER S,NEUTENS T,et al.Spatiotemporal Accessibility to Supermarkets Using Public Transit: An Interaction Potential Approach in Cincinnati,Ohio［J］.Journal of Transport Geography,2015,42:72-83.
［9］TAHMASBI B,MANSOURIANFAR M H,HAGHSHENAS H,et al.Multimodal Accessibilitybased Equity Assessment of Urban Public Facilities Distribution［J/OL］.Sustainable Cities and Society,2019,49:101633［2022-01-05］.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101633.
［10］SILVA C,PINHO P.The Structural Accessibility Layer(SAL):Revealing how Urban Structure Constrains Travel Choice［J］.Environment and Planning A,2010,42(11):2735-2752.
［11］KWOK R C W,YEH A G O.The Use of Modal Accessibility Gap as an Indicator for Sustainable Transport Development［J］.Environment and Planning A,2004,36(5):921-936.
［12］SALONEN M,TOIVONEN T.Modelling Travel Time in Urban Networks: Comparable Measures for Private Car and Public Transport［J］.Journal of Transport Geography,2013,31:143-153.
［13］KWAN M,MURRAY A T,O'KELLY M E,et al.Recent Advances in Accessibility Research: Representation, Methodology and Applications［J］.Journal of Geographical Systems,2003,5(1):129-138.
［14］YANG W Y,CHEN B Y,CAO X S,et al.The Spatial Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Modal Accessibility Gaps: A Case Study for Guangzhou, China［J］.Journal of Transport Geography,2017,60:21-32.
［15］CHEN M J,CHEN Y M,WANG X G,et al.Spatial Difference of Transitbased Accessibility to Hospitals by Regions Using Spatially Adjusted ANOVA［J］.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2019,16(11):1923-1923.
［16］XU W T,ZHANG W,LI L.Measuring the Expected Locational Accessibility of Urban Transit Network for Commuting Trips［J］.Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment,2017,51:62-81.
［17］蒋海兵,刘建国,蒋金亮.高速铁路影响下的全国旅游景点可达性研究［J］.旅游学刊,2014,29(7):58-67.
［18］潘竟虎,李俊峰.中国A级旅游景点空间分布特征与可达性［J］.自然资源学报,2014,29(1):55-66.
［19］刘海隆,包安明,陈曦,等.新疆交通可达性对区域经济的影响分析［J］.地理学报,2008,63(4):428-436.
［20］吴威,曹有挥,曹卫东,等.开放条件下长江三角洲区域的综合交通可达性空间格局［J］.地理研究,2007,26(2):391-402.
［21］郑智成,张丽君,秦耀辰,等.基于多模式交通网络的开封市公园景点可达性［J］.地域研究与开发,2019,38(4):60-67.
［22］王美霞,蒋才芳,王永明,等.基于公路交通网的武陵山片区旅游景点可达性格局分析［J］.经济地理,2014,34(6):187-192.
［23］蒋海兵,徐建刚,祁毅.京沪高铁对区域中心城市陆路可达性影响［J］.地理学报,2010,65(10):1287-1298.
［24］张琪,谢双玉,王晓芳,等.基于空间句法的武汉市旅游景点可达性评价［J］.经济地理,2015,35(8):200-208.
［25］黄应淮,刘小平,刘艳平,等.基于高德地图API的多种交通方式下城市公园时空可达性分析:以广州市海珠区为例［J］.地理与地理信息科学,2018,34(6):50-57.
［26］刘万波,朱正晖,王利.基于场强模型的辽宁沿海港口腹地划分［J］.资源开发与市场,2019,35(5):618-624.
［27］杨俊,鲍雅君,金翠,等.大连城市绿地可达性对房价影响的差异性分析［J］.地理科学,2018,38(12):1952-1960.
［28］蒋海兵,张文忠,韦胜.公共交通影响下的北京公共服务设施可达性［J］.地理科学进展,2017,36(10):1239-1249.
［29］王振波,徐建刚,朱传耿,等.中国县域可达性区域划分及其与人口分布的关系［J］.地理学报,2010,65(4):416-426.
［30］陈博文,陆玉麒,柯文前,等.江苏交通可达性与区域经济发展水平关系测度:基于空间计量视角［J］.地理研究,2015,34(12):2283-2294.
［31］靳诚,黄震方.基于可达性技术的长江三角洲旅游区划［J］.地理研究,2012,31(4):745-757.
［32］王绍博,郭建科.中国风景名胜区交通可达性及市场潜力空间测度［J］.地理研究,2016,35(9):1714-1726.
［33］汪德根,钱佳,牛玉.高铁网络化下中国城市旅游场强空间格局及演化［J］.地理学报,2016,71(10):1784-1800.
［34］潘竟虎,从忆波.中国4A级以上旅游景点(区)空间可达性测度［J］.地理科学,2012,32(11):1321-1327.
［35］黄泰,席建超,葛全胜.高铁影响下城市群旅游空间的竞争格局分异［J］.经济地理,2017,37(8):182-191.
［36］徐明非,欧晓培,王元庆.城市群公路可达性与衔接提升研究［J］.中国公路学报,2020,33(11):245-254.
［37］沈惊宏,余兆旺,沈宏婷.区域旅游空间结构演化模式研究:以安徽省为例［J］.经济地理,2015,35(1):180-186.
［38］孙建伟,田野,崔家兴,等.湖北省旅游空间结构识别与可达性测度［J］.经济地理,2017,37(4):208-217.
［39］李亚婷,秦耀辰,闫卫阳,等.河南省公路网络的可达性空间格局及其演化特征［J］.地域研究与开发,2010,29(1):60-64.
［40］曹小曙,阎小培.经济发达地区交通网络演化对通达性空间格局的影响:以广东省东莞市为例［J］.地理研究,2003,22(3):305-312.
［41］余汝艺,梁留科,孙亚楠,等.洛阳市村域尺度旅游效率分析与可达性研究［J］.地域研究与开发,2020,39(5):105-109.
［42］闫翠丽,梁留科,刘晓静,等.基于因子分析的城市旅游竞争力评价:以中原经济区30个省辖市为例［J］.地域研究与开发,2014,33(1):63-67.
［43］史本林,张宏娜,孟德友,等.河南入境旅游经济区域差异及极化格局研究［J］.地域研究与开发,2011,30(2):128-132.
［44］河南省统计局.河南统计年鉴［M］.北京:中国统计出版社,2022.
［45］吴清,李细归,吴黎,等.湖南省A级旅游景区分布格局及空间相关性分析［J］.经济地理,2017,37(2):193-200.
［46］李文正.陕南旅游交通网可达性测算及其空间格局评价研究［J］.西北大学学报(自然科学版),2013,43(4):639.
［47］陈美球,肖鹤亮,何维佳,等.耕地流转农户行为影响因素的实证分析:基于江西省1396户农户耕地流转行为现状的调研［J］.自然资源学报,2008,23(3):369-374.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉