EN中文

地域研究与开发 >

2023 , Vol. 42 >Issue 2: 150 - 154,166

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2023.02.024

生态环境

1995—2020年淮河流域生态系统服务权衡协同关系的尺度效应

展开
  • 河南理工大学 测绘与国土信息工程学院，河南 焦作 454003
乔旭宁(1977-)，男，河南洛阳市人，教授，博士，主要从事土地利用与生态系统服务研究，（E-mail）qiaoxuning@126.com。

网络出版日期: 2024-06-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41971274)；河南省高校哲学社会科学创新团队项目(2021-CXTD-08,2022-CXTD-02)

收起

Trade-off and Synergy of Ecosystem Services and Their Scale Effects in the Huaihe River Basin from 1995 to 2020

Expand
  • School of Surveying and Mapping and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China

Online published: 2024-06-25

Fold

摘要

淮河流域是我国人类活动密集区域和粮食主产区。基于1995—2020年淮河流域的土地利用、气象数据及社会经济等数据，运用InVEST模型及GIS空间分析方法评估产水量、土壤保持、碳储量、食物供给和植被净初级生产力5种生态系统服务的时空变化特征，采用主成分分析流域像元、县域及市域尺度下生态系统服务的权衡协同关系。结果表明：（1）1995—2020年淮河流域生态系统服务整体增强，产水量的年平均深度增加了265.60 mm，土壤保持服务增加了28.21×108 t，碳储量减少了1.04×108 t，食物供给增加了702.76 t·km-2，NPP增加了293.88 gC·m-2·a-1。（2）淮河流域生态系统服务的权衡协同关系随时间呈动态变化，在县域市域尺度上相对稳定，在像元尺度上变化明显。（3）淮河流域生态系统服务的权衡协同关系随尺度变化表现出异质性和尺度依赖性。生态系统服务间的作用关系在不同尺度上既表现出某种一致性，又更多地表现为尺度上的差异性和动态性。

关键词： 生态系统服务；权衡协同关系；尺度效应；淮河流域

本文引用格式

乔旭宁, 杨祯, 杨永菊 . 1995—2020年淮河流域生态系统服务权衡协同关系的尺度效应[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2023 , 42(2) : 150 -154,166 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2023.02.024

Abstract

Based on land use, meteorological data and socio-economic data of the Huaihe River Basin from 1995 to 2020, this paper uses the InVEST model and GIS spatial analysis to assess the spatial and temporal variability of five ecosystem services: water production, soil conservation, carbon storage, food supply and net primary productivity of vegetation, and uses principal component analysis to study the weighting of ecosystem services at the meta, county and municipal scales. The results showed that: (1) From 1995 to 2020, ecosystem services in the Huaihe River Basin were enhanced as a whole, with the annual average depth of water production increasing by 265.60 mm, soil conservation services increasing by 28.21×108 t, carbon storage decreasing by 1.04×108 t, food supply increasing by 702.76 t·km-2, and NPP increasing by 293.88 gC·m-2·a-1. (2) The trade-off and synergy of ecosystem services in the Huaihe River Basin changed dynamically with time, relatively stable at the county and city scale, and changed significantly at the pixel scale. (3) The trade-off synergistic relationship of ecosystem services in the Huaihe River Basin showed heterogeneity and scale dependence with scale changes. The role relationships between ecosystem services showed some consistency at different scales, and were more manifested as differences and dynamics at scales.

Key words： ecosystem services; trade-off and synergy; scale effect; Huaihe River Basin

参考文献

［1］DAILY G C.Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems［M］.Washington,D.C.:Island Press,1997.
［2］李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题［J］.地理研究,2013,32(8):1379-1390.
［3］RODRGUEZ J P,BEARD T D,BENNETT E M,et al.Tradeoffs across Space,Time,and Ecosystem Services［J］.Ecology and Society,2006，11(1):709-723.
［4］李鹏,姜鲁光,封志明,等.生态系统服务竞争与协同研究进展［J］.生态学报,2012,32(16):5219-5229.
［5］LI C,ZHENG H,LI S,et al.Impacts of Conservation and Human Development Policy across Stakeholders and Scales［J］.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2015,112(24):7396-7401.
［6］傅伯杰,周国逸,白永飞,等.中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全［J］.地球科学进展,2009,24(6):571-576.
［7］李文华,张彪,谢高地.中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望［J］.自然资源学报,2009,24(1):1-10.
［8］QIAO X,GU Y,ZOU C,et al.Temporal Variation and Spatial Scale Dependency of the Tradeoffs and Synergies among Multiple Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China［J］.Science of the Total Environment,2019,651:218-229.
［9］赵婷,潘竟虎.讨赖河流域生态系统服务权衡与协同的多尺度测度［J］.生态与农村环境学报,2022,38(7):839-850.
［10］BUTLER J R A,WONG G Y,METCALFE D J,et al.An Analysis of Trade-offs between Multiple Ecosystem Services and Stakeholders Linked to Land Use and Water Quality Management in the Great Barrier Reef,Australia［J］.Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2013,180:176-191.
［11］胡其玉,陈松林.厦漳泉地区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系分析［J］.地域研究与开发,2021,40(2):145-150.
［12］刘莹,耿文亮,邵静文,等.“三生空间”视角下土地利用变化与生态系统服务价值响应：以黄河下游地区为例［J］.地域研究与开发,2021,40(4):129-135.
［13］张宇硕,吴殿廷.京津冀地区生态系统服务权衡的多尺度特征与影响因素解析［J］.地域研究与开发,2019,38(3):141-147.
［14］孙艺杰,任志远,郝梦雅,等.黄土高原生态系统服务权衡与协同时空变化及影响因素：以延安市为例［J］.生态学报,2019,39(10):3443-3454.
［15］BAI Y,ZHENG H,OUYANG Z,et al.Modeling Hydrological Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs:A Case Study in Baiyangdian Watershed,China［J］.Environmental Earth Sciences,2013,70(2):709-718.
［16］方露露,许德华,王伦澈,等.长江、黄河流域生态系统服务变化及权衡协同关系研究［J］.地理研究,2021,40(3):821-838.
［17］武文欢,彭建,刘焱序,等.鄂尔多斯市生态系统服务权衡与协同分析［J］.地理科学进展,2017,36(12):1571-1581.
［18］孙艺杰,任志远,赵胜男,等.陕西河谷盆地生态系统服务协同与权衡时空差异分析［J］.地理学报,2017,72(3):521-532.
［19］TURNER K G,ODGAARD M V,BOCHER P K,et al.Bundling Ecosystem Services in Denmark:Trade-offs and Synergies in a Cultural Landscape［J］.Landscape and Urban Planning,2014,125:89-104.
［20］余玉洋,李晶,周自翔,等.基于多尺度秦巴山区生态系统服务权衡协同关系的表达［J］.生态学报,2020,40(16):5465-5477.
［21］黄颖,李鑫.1995—2015年淮河生态经济区生态系统服务评估与时空变化分析［J］.生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(1):49-56.
［22］BUDYKO M I.Climate and Life［M］.New York:Academic,1974:217-243.
［23］FU B J,ZHAO W W,CHEN L D,et al.Assessment of Soil Erosion at Large Watershed Scale Using RUSLE and GIS:A Case Study in the Loess Plateau of China［J］.Land Degradation & Development,2005,16(1):73-85.
［24］李瑾璞,夏少霞,于秀波,等.基于InVEST模型的河北省陆地生态系统碳储量研究［J］.生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(7):854-861.
［25］赵文亮,贺振,贺俊平,等.基于MODISNDVI的河南省冬小麦产量遥感估测［J］.地理研究,2012,31(12):2310-2320.
［26］朱文泉,潘耀忠,张锦水.中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算［J］.植物生态学报,2007,31(3):413-424.
［27］张静静,朱文博,朱连奇,等.伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务权衡/协同效应多尺度分析［J］.地理学报,2020,75(5):975-988.
［28］ZHENG H,WANG L,WU T.Coordinating Ecosystem Service Trade-offs to Achieve Winwin Outcomes:A Review of the Approaches［J］.Journal of Environmental Sciences,2019,82:103-112.

［29］杨阳,窦艳星,王云强,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小流域生态系统服务权衡与协同［J］.生态学报,2022，42(20):8152-8168.

［30］李鸿健,任志远,刘焱序,等.西北河谷盆地生态系统服务的权衡与协同分析：以银川盆地为例［J］.中国沙漠,2016,36(6):1731-1738.
［31］PAN J,WEI S,LI Z.Spatiotemporal Pattern of Trade-offs and Synergistic Relationships among Multiple Ecosystem Services in an Arid Inland River Basin in NW China［J］.Ecological Indicators,2020,114:106345.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉