An evaluation index system of cultural soft power is constructed based on six dimensions of cultural attraction, display, communication, innovation, cultural investment and cultural and tourism integration. Taking 30 prefecture-level cities in the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration as examples, spatial classification, nuclear density analysis and spatial autocorrelation methods are used to analyze the spatial characteristics of cultural soft power in the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration and analyze its influencing factors. The results show that: (1) From the difference of comprehensive strength, the number of high and higher strength is small and mainly distributed in the core area, only 3 middle strength areas, and half of the cities are distributed in the low and lower strength areas. The western half of the wall shows a central and peripheral pattern led by Zhengzhou and Kaifeng, while the eastern half shows polarization characteristics led by Bozhou and Fuyang, and forms a low-value stretch from Liaocheng to Zhumadian between the eastern and western halves. (2) From the perspective of sub-dimensional spatial differences, the sub-system of cultural attraction and display power is similar to the comprehensive strength, while the sub-system of cultural investment power is “high in the northwest and low in the southeast”. In addition, the sub-systems of cultural transmission and innovation presented a completely different pattern from the previous three sub-systems, showing a distribution structure with low value surrounded by high value with Zhengzhou and Kaifeng as the core. (3) From the perspective of spatial agglomeration and correlation, the Central Plains region has formed a dual-core agglomeration situation of “one master and one pair” around Zhengzhou and Bozhou respectively, and a significant HH agglomeration group has formed near the main core area. Among them, the concentration pattern of the cultural attraction subsystem and comprehensive strength is basically the same, the concentration center of the cultural display power subsystem is weakened in Zhengzhou but strengthened in Bozhou, the cultural communication power and innovation power subsystem only form the cluster core in the central part of the country, and the cultural and tourism integration power subsystem forms two cluster cores in the southeast based on the comprehensive pattern. (4) From the perspective of influencing factors, urban GDP has the strongest influence on the soft power of urban culture, followed by the added value of the tertiary industry, and the influence of traffic facilities, the number of science, education, culture and health units and the urbanization rate is not obvious.
［1］胡锦涛.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗：在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告［J］.求是,2007(21):3-22.
［2］胡锦涛.坚定不移沿着中国特色社会主义道路前进 为全面建成小康社会而奋斗：在中国共产党第十八次全国代表大会上的报告［J］.求是,2012(22):3-25.
［3］习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗：在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告［J］.中华人民共和国国务院公报,2022(30):4-27.
［4］文化和旅游部.“十四五”文化和旅游发展规划［N］.中国文化报,2021-06-03(2).
［5］JOSEPH N.Bound to Lead:The Changing Nature of American Power［M］.New York:Basic Books,1990:25-28.
［6］HODGSON C.Soft Power:The Means to Suceess in World Politics by Joseph S. Nye［J］.American Economist,2005,49(4):680-681.
［7］HOLYK G G.Paper Tiger?Chinese Soft Power in East Asia［J］.Political Science Quarterly,2011,126(2):223-254.
［8］LIEVENS F,HARRIS M M,et al.Predicting Cross-cultural Training Performance:The Validity of Personality,Cognitive Ability,and Dimensions Measured by an Assessment Center and a Behavior Description Interview［J］.Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88(3):476-489.
［9］童清艳,LIANGTAO S.英国文化旅游传播及其保护机制研究［J］.西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2018,39(5):7-13.
［10］张建,吴文.智文化产业驱动旅游经济的模式与国际经验［J］.旅游学刊,2015,30(8):4-6.
［11］叶淑兰.日本文化软实力:生成与借鉴［J］.社会科学,2015,37(2):12-22.
［12］孟丽荣,孟保芹.韩国“文化立国”战略及其启示意义［J］.重庆理工大学学报(社会科学),2019,13(1):135-140.
［13］金春梅,凌强.文化软实力视角下的日本观光立国战略［J］.世界地理研究,2014,23(3):110-116.
［14］魏恩政,张锦.关于文化软实力的几点认识和思考［J］.理论学刊,2009,26(3):13-17.
［15］齐勇锋,李平凡.完善公共文化服务体系提高国家文化软实力［J］.中国特色社会主义研究,2012,18(1):64-72.
［16］肖映胜.论中国特色文化软实力的科学内涵及发展思路［J］.中共福建省委党校学报,2014,26(12):38-42.
［17］刘镇,潘泽云.城市群政策与方言多样性对城市文化发展与协调的影响：基于多期双重差分法的分析［J］.地域研究与开发,2022,41(4):65-70.
［18］任唤麟.跨区域线性文化遗产类旅游资源价值评价：以长安-天山廊道路网中国段为例［J］.地理科学,2017,37(10):1560-1568.
［19］王萍,刘敏,刘慧娣.山西省非物质文化遗产资源旅游利用潜力评价［J］.地域研究与开发,2017,36(3):92-98.
［20］潘玉香,赵梦琳,朱文宇.京津冀协同发展背景下文化产业资源配置效率评价与对策［J］.科技进步与对策,2017,34(7):49-54.
［21］冯根尧.我国文化产业园区竞争力评价与省际差异研究：基于31个省市的实证分析［J］.中国科技论坛,2014,30(1):69-75.
［22］杨头平,潘桑桑.中部地区文化产业竞争力评价与差异分析［J］.经济地理,2018,38(12):119-125.
［23］袁渊,于凡.文化产业高质量发展水平测度与评价［J］.统计与决策,2020,36(21):62-66.
［24］鲁小伟,毕功兵.基于主成分分析法的区域文化产业效率评价［J］.统计与决策,2014,30(1):63-65.
［25］蔡礼彬,王琼.山东省文化产业竞争力评价体系构建与实证研究［J］.华东经济管理,2012,26(10):19-25.
［26］李正彪,薛勇军.基于AHP模型的文化产业竞争力评价：以云南省为例［J］.资源开发与市场,2016,32(3):293-297.
［27］杨丽,王晓晓.“一带一路”背景下我国与中东欧国家文化产业国际竞争力比较分析［J］.经济与管理评论,2018,34(4):149-161.
［28］焦念涛.非物质文化遗产与旅游产业耦合协调度评价及影响因素：以山东省为例［J］.社会科学家,2022,37(11):49-57.
［29］孙剑锋,李世泰,纪晓萌,等.山东省文化资源与旅游产业协调发展评价与优化［J］.经济地理,2019,39(8):207-215.
［30］刘瑞宽,李九全,常芳,等.西安市文化设施空间分布研究：基于聚类和地理探测器的分析［J］.地域研究与开发,2023,42(2):60-66.
［31］叶前林,刘海玉,朱文兴.区域文化创意产业集聚水平测度及影响因素分析［J］.统计与决策,2022,38(4):84-87.
［32］徐彦,韦素琼,徐旳,等.文化创意产业空间分布与城市区位功能影响分析：以台中市为例［J］.地域研究与开发,2022,41(4):52-58.
［33］张安忠.黄河流域文化产业高质量发展水平评价［J］.统计与决策,2023,39(4):127-131.
［34］胡妍妍.优秀传统文化现代表达的创新路径探析：以河南卫视“中国节日”系列节目为例［J］.中州学刊,2021,43(11):168-172.
［35］喻蕾.文化产业高质量发展：评价指标体系构建及其政策意义［J］.经济地理,2021,41(6):147-153.
［36］朱卫未,林华萍,叶美兰.网络文化软实力的综合评价方法与应用［J］.电子政务,2020,17(9):51-59.
［37］伊彤,王海峰,张国会,等.北京文化和科技融合发展评价研究［J］.中国科技论坛,2021,26(8):82-89.
［38］何超,李萌,李婷婷,等.多目标综合评价中四种确定权重方法的比较与分析［J］.湖北大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(2):172-178.
［39］胡伟华,任和,王康.西部地区人才竞争力时空演变分析［J］.地域研究与开发,2023,42(5):22-27.
［40］冯雨雪,李广东.青藏高原城镇化与生态环境交互影响关系分析［J］.地理学报,2020,75(7):1386-1405.
［41］温倩倩,蒲小琴,宋博,等.乡镇尺度下河南省人口-经济耦合协调发展的空间格局［J］.地域研究与开发,2020,39(6):36-41.
［42］李蝶,王伟,张野,等.黄河流域国家级文物保护单位时空演变及影响因素［J］.地域研究与开发,2023,42(2):173-180.
［43］张改素,魏建飞,丁志伟.中国镇域工业化和城镇化综合水平的空间格局特征及其影响因素［J］.地理研究,2020,39(3):627-650.
［44］栾成显.徽州文化的形成与演变历程［J］.安徽史学,2014,58(2):109-113.
［45］余琛,朱晨雨.中华传统文化短视频跨文化传播效果影响因素研究［J］.中国出版,2021,44(23):47-52.
［46］陶洁怡,董平,周年兴,等.长江经济带历史文化名镇名村空间分布特征及影响因素研究［J］.地理与地理信息科学,2022,38(3):66-73.
［47］薛宝琪.河南省区域文化产业效率空间异质性及影响因素［J］.地域研究与开发,2022,41(3):31-37.
