paper
RAN Qinghong, SUN Chuanmin, WEI Chaofu, XIE Deti, YUE Yunhua
.
2010, 32(9):
1718-1725.
The purpose of this paper is to systematically analyze the alert values of cultivated land
in 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities of mainland China, based on the national
warning values of cultivated land, with the aim to provide reference for national land management
decision-making. The warning values of arable land at provincial levels vary greatly. On the basis
of differences in the pressure index, cultivated land pressures in major provinces in China were
analyzed in detail in order to build the interest-driven mechanism for arable land protection with
incentives-constraint. The major regional coefficients were designed accordingly. An algorithm for
quantifying the alert values of per capita arable land and examining regional differences in
farmland alert values in 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities was used in this
analysis. The pressure index of cultivated land, and the farmland surplus or deficit were calculated
to understand the Red Line of arable land protection given by government. Results showed that
there were marked differences in the warning values of the arable land without taking into account
differences in food consumption expenditure in each province. In terms of the warning values of
the arable land, Hunan Province was the smallest and Gansu Province was the largest. As for the
pressure index of the cultivated land, Heilongjiang was the smallest and Beijing was the largest.
Without accounting for differences in consumption, the warning value of the arable land in Gansu
was found to be 7.78 times more than that in Hunan. The pressure index of the cultivated land in
Beijing was estimated to be 15.04 times more than that in Heilongjiang. But the warning value of
the arable land under the condition of taking differences in consumption into consideration in
Gansu was 5.31 times more than that in Hunan. The pressure index of the cultivated land in Beijing
was 37.77 times more than that in Heilongjiang. It can be drawn that the pressures from the
cultivated land in light of the warning values of the arable land at the provincial level vary greatly.
In terms of the pressure differences, a land incentives-constraint management at different levels
was pointed out. Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin and Guangdong were the strong constraint level
province and municipalities in farmland management. Shanxi, Zhejiang, Fujian, Tibet, Shaanxi,
Qinghai, and Liaoning were under a general constraint level. The others were taken as
policy-encouraging provinces in arable management. In terms of the arable land demand for food
production, farmland deficit provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities involve Beijing,
Tianjin, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Fujian, Guangdong, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Tibet, Qinghai, and Liaoning,
showing varying magnitudes of deficits. The others were farmland surplus provinces. Based on the
surplus or deficit of arable land, where farmland was utilized to produce food, national Food -
Ecological Security payments paid by provinces and autonomous regions and the transfer-payment
system regulated by governments should be built to prevent the arable land from consistently
decreasing in these deficit provinces and to stimulate protection of cultivated land in those surplus
provinces.