环境治理

不同质地土壤对玉米产量及水分利用效率的影响

  • 赵天旭 ,
  • 丁晋利
展开
  • 1.郑州师范学院地理与旅游学院,中国 郑州 450044;
    2.农业农村部作物高效用水原阳科学观测实验站,中国 原阳 453514
* 丁晋利,博士,副教授,研究方向:土壤生态与节水农业,E-mail:dingjinli1978@163.com。

收稿日期: 2025-02-21

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-11

基金资助

河南省重点研发与推广项目(科技攻关)(232102110054)

Effects of Different Soil Textures on Maize Yield and Water Use Efficiency

  • ZHAO Tianxu ,
  • DING Jinli
Expand
  • 1. School of Geography and Tourism,Zhengzhou Normal University,Zhengzhou 450044,China;
    2. Yuanyang Experimental Station of Crop Water Use,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Yuanyang 453514,China

Received date: 2025-02-21

  Online published: 2026-03-11

摘要

为分析不同质地的土壤蓄水保墒的效果及对作物产量的影响,本文基于 2023 和 2024 年的田间试验数据,分析粉砂壤土、粉砂土和砂质壤土深度为 [0,20],(20,40],(40,60],(60,80] 和 (80,100]cm的容重、孔隙度、饱和导水率和田间持水量的差异,研究 3 种土壤在 0~100cm深度下土壤含水量、贮水量和耗水量特征,阐明粉砂壤土、粉砂土和砂质壤土对玉米产量及水分利用效率(WUE)的影响。研究结果表明,在 0~100cm深度下,砂质壤土较其他两种土壤的平均容重和田间持水量下降,但土壤孔隙度和饱和导水率提高了。连续 2 年在玉米苗期、拔节期和扬花期, 0~100cm深度的土层平均含水量和贮水量均从高到低表现为粉砂壤土、粉砂土、砂质壤土。此外,粉砂壤土、粉砂土和砂质壤土对玉米株高、穗位和叶片数无显著影响(P>0.5),但与砂质壤土相比,粉砂壤土和粉砂土处理连续 2 年提高了玉米产量,其中 2023 年粉砂壤土和粉砂土分别提高玉米产量24.9%和13.6%。连续 2 年 3 种土壤水分利用效率从高到低表现为粉砂壤土、粉砂土、砂质壤土。综上,粉砂壤土的蓄水保墒及增产效果显著优于粉砂土和砂质壤土。

本文引用格式

赵天旭 , 丁晋利 . 不同质地土壤对玉米产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2025 , 48(6) : 27 -34 . DOI: 10.7612/j.issn.2096-5281.2025.06.004

Abstract

To analyze soil water storage and moisture retention effects of different soil textures and their impacts on crop yield,this study used field experiment data in 2023 and 2024 to examine the differences in soil bulk weight,soil porosity,saturated hydraulic conductivity,and field capacity of silty loam,silty sand,and sandy loam at soil depths of [0,20],(20,40],(40,60],(60,80],and (80,100]cm.The characteristics of soil water content,water storage,and water consumption in the 0-100cm soil layer were investigated to clarify the effects of these three soil types on maize yield and water use efficiency(WUE).The results showed that the sandy loam had lower average soil bulk density and field water-holding capacity but higher soil porosity and saturated hydraulic conductivity in the 0-100cm soil layer as compared with the other two soil types.Over two years,the average water content and water storage in the 0-100cm soil layer decreased in the order of silty loam,silty sand,and sandy loam at maize seedling,jointing,and flowering stages.In addition,the three soil textures had no significant effect on the maize plant height,ear position,and leaf number(P>0.5).However,compared with sandy loam,silty loam and silty sand treatments increased maize yield for two consecutive years,with silty loam and silty sand boosting yields by 24.9% and 13.6%,respectively,in 2023.The water use efficiency of the three soil textures over two years decreased in the order of silty loam,silty sand,and sandy loam.In conclusion,silty loam significantly outperformed silty sand and sandy loam in the soil water storage and moisture retention as well as the increment of maize yield.

参考文献

[1] 河南省统计局. 2024 年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2025-04-03)[2025-04-10].https://tjj.henan.gov.cn/ 2025/04-02/3143962.html.
[2] 杨永辉,武继承,赵世伟,等.不同保墒与土壤结构改良措施对土壤结构及小麦、玉米水分利用的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25( 2 ):220-227.
[3] 尚金霞,李军,贾志宽,等.渭北旱塬春玉米田保护性耕作蓄水保墒效果与增产增收效应[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(13):2668-2678.
[4] 茹瑞红,农全东,李在辉,等.文山州土壤质地构成与肥力特征[J].贵州农业科学,2024,52(6):54-60.
[5] WANG A N,ZHANG Y F,WANG G L,et al.Soil physicochemical properties and microorganisms jointly regulate the variations of soil carbon and nitrogen cycles along vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau,China[J].Plant Soil,2024, 494(1): 413-436.
[6] GIOVANNETTI M,DI FOSSALUNGA A S,STRINGLIS I A,et al.Unearthing soil-plant-microbiota crosstalk:Looking back to move forward[J].Front Plant Sci,2022,13:1082752.
[7] PENG M W,HE H,WANG Z K,et al.Responses and comprehensive evaluation of growth characteristics of ephemeral plants in the desert-oasis ecotone to soil types[J].J Environ Manag,2022,316:115288.
[8] 徐莹莹,孙士明,靳晓燕,等.不同耕作措施对土壤质构和玉米产量的影响[J].玉米科学,2022,30(4):97-106.
[9] 范赛君. 不同耕作措施对夏玉米生长及产量的影响[J].农业开发与装备,2023(12):150-152.
[10] 迟景尚. 不同土壤对不同基因型玉米产量的影响研究[J].种子科技,2024,42(3):20-22.
[11] 李潮海,王群,郝四平.土壤物理性质对土壤生物活性及作物生长的影响研究进展[J].河南农业大学学报,2002,36(1):32-37.
[12] 黄勇,杨青华,李潮海,等.不同质地土壤对高油玉米产量和品质的影响[J].玉米科学,2006,14(2):127-129.
[13] 孙国军,李卫红,朱成刚,等.新疆伊犁河谷表层土壤容重的空间变异性分析[J].资源科学,2016,38(7):1222-1228.
[14] 孙为. 豫北潮土区耕作对土壤理化性质及小麦-玉米产量的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2024.
[15] 李卓,吴普特,冯浩,等.黏粒质量分数对土壤水分蓄持能力影响的模拟试验[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(5):94-99.
[16] 李卓,冯浩,吴普特,等.砂粒含量对土壤水分蓄持能力影响模拟试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(3): 204-208.
[17] 李卓,吴普特,冯浩,等.容重对土壤水分蓄持能力影响模拟试验研究[J].土壤学报,2010,47(4):611-620.
[18] 潘云,吕殿青.土壤容重对土壤水分人渗特性影响研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2009,28(2):59-61,77.
[19] VAZ C M P,MANIERI J M,DE MARIA I C,et al.Modeling and correction of soil penetration resistance for varying soil water content[J].Geoderma,2011,166(1):92-101.
[20] 王群,张学林,李全忠,等.紧实胁迫对不同土壤类型玉米养分吸收、分配及产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(21):4356-4366.
[21] 陆欣春,范欣欣,邹文秀,等.肥沃耕层构建对白浆土土壤肥力和玉米产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(4): 883-891.
[22] 梁璐,周宝元,高卓晗,等.不同品种玉米根-冠生长对土壤紧实胁迫的差异性响应特征[J].作物学报,2024,50(8): 2053-2066.
[23] 高壮壮,刘海军,张智郡,等.不同质地条件下土壤表层温度与土壤蒸发量的关系研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2019,38(9):42-48.
[24] 李京京,刘文,任天宝,等.不同土壤质地和含水率对炭基肥料氮素矿化的影响[J].土壤,2020,52(1):40-46.
[25] 刘济明,梁格林,高攀,等.不同土壤质地对米槁幼苗生长特性的影响[J].中国野生植物资源,2021,40(9):23-28.
[26] 郑存德. 土壤物理性质对玉米生长影响及高产农田土壤物理特征研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2012.
[27] 河南省土壤肥料工作站、河南省土壤普查办公室.河南土种志[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995.
文章导航

/