网络出版日期: 2024-07-03
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目“深部硬岩巷道围岩板裂化破坏动静力学响应机制”(52204160);江苏省自然科学基金项目“高应力硬岩爆破开挖诱发围岩非常规破裂特征及力学机理”(BK20210515);中国博士后科学基金项目“滇中地区深井巷道围岩板裂破坏机理与失稳判据”(2022MD713814)
Evaluation of Rock Mass Quality of Phosphorite Mines by Topology Based on Optimal Combination Weight
Online published: 2024-07-03
为解决岩体质量评价相邻等级之间指标参数模糊不确定性问题,引入可拓学理论,提出基于优化组合赋权的可拓学岩体质量分级模型,对昆阳二矿磷矿山地下开采的岩石进行质量评价。首先,根据矿山地质特征选取岩石单轴饱和抗压强度(Rc)、岩石质量指标(RQD)、节理间距(Jd)、结构面条件(Jf)、地下水状态(W)和地应力影响系数(Z)6个影响指标,将每个指标划分为5个等级;然后通过改进的层次分析法和熵权法分别确定指标的主观和客观权重,引入矩估计法对主客观权重进行优化组合;最后应用修正的RMR法和Q系统法对岩体质量进行评价,将分级结果与基于优化组合赋权的可拓学岩体质量分级结果进行比较。研究表明:5个待评价岩体中,除上矿体N3的模型分级结果与修正RMR法存在差异之外,其余岩体的分级结果与修正RMR法相同,使用Q系统法的评价结果整体偏低。此外,该模型可得出岩体质量等级偏向于相邻等级的程度,分级结果符合昆阳二矿磷矿山生产勘探地质报告岩体质量范围,比修正RMR法和Q系统法更加准确,验证了本文方法的可靠性,为地下矿山开采提供了技术支撑。
凡奥奇, 王万禄, 李树建, 张斌, 刘映辉, 吴浩 . 基于优化组合赋权的可拓学磷矿山岩体质量评价[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2024 , 32(1) : 132 -143 . DOI: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2024.01.146
In order to solve the problem of fuzzy uncertainty of index parameters between adjacent grades of rock quality evaluation, the theory of topology was introduced and the topological rock mass quality grading model based on optimal combination weight was proposed to evaluate the quality of rocks in underground mining of the phosphate mine in Kunyang No.2 mine.According to the geological characteristics of the mine,six influence indexes,namely,uniaxial saturated compressive strength of rock(Rc),rock quality index(RQD),joint spacing(Jd),structural surface condition(Jf),groundwater status(W) and geostress influence coefficient(Z) were selected,and each index was divided into five grades.Then,the subjective and objective weights of the indicators were determined by the improved hierarchical analysis and entropy weight methods,respectively,and the moment estimation method was introduced to optimize the combination of subjective and objective weights.Finally,the modified RMR method and Q-system method were applied to evaluate the quality of the rock mass,and the grading results were compared with the quality classification results of the rock mass based on the optimal combination weights.The results show that,among the five rock masses to be evaluated,the evaluation result for the upper ore body rock is Class Ⅱ,with a characteristic value of 2.57,indicating good rock mass quality and certain self-stabilizing ability.It is determined that the support method of anchor spraying and hanging net should be adopted.For the lower ore body,the characteristic value is 3.68,indicating that the rock mass quality is approaching Class Ⅳ,and the stability of the surrounding rock in the roadway is poor.Immediate initial spraying should be carried out after the excavation of the roadway to control the deformation of the surrounding rock,followed by the use of the anchor spraying and hanging net support method.There are differences in the grading results of the upper ore body N3,and the grading results of the rest of the rock bodies by the proposed method are the same as those of the modified RMR method.The overall low evaluation results using the Q-system method are caused by the failure to take into account the role of geostress and the discontinuity in the grading between the grades.In addition,the model is able to determine the degree to which the rock mass quality grade leans towards the adjacent grade.The classification results are consistent with the geological exploration report of the Kunyang No.2 mine,and are more accurate than the modified RMR method and Q-system method,validating the reliability of the method proposed in this paper and providing technical support for underground mining.
null | Cao Chen, Li Huizhong, Chen Jianping,et al,2017.Rock quality evaluation of dam foundation based on component and cloud model weighting method[J].Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science),38(11):1643-1647. |
null | Cao Wengui, Zhang Yongjie,2006.Study on two-level fuzzy synthetic judgement method with changing weight value for rock quality classification in underground structures[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,(8):1612-1618. |
null | Chai Naijie, Zhou Wenliang,2023.Quality classification of rock mass in dam foundation based on optimized combination weight and fuzzy variable set[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),53(2):514-525. |
null | Chen Junchi,2014.Research of analyzing the stability of stope and support technology based on rock mass classification[D].Shenyang:Northeastern University. |
null | Chen Mao, Yao Xiwen, Xu Kaili,2022.Evaluation of water inrush risk in metal mines based on AHP-EWM-Cloud model[J].Nonferrous Metals Engineering,12(11):102-110. |
null | Guo Bin, Xue Xilong, Xu Min,2011.Application of improved analytic hierarchy process-grey clustering method on mine rock mass classification[J].Metal Mine,40(11):14-19. |
null | He Huaijian, Bai Shiwei, Chen Jian,2002.Illation of geotechnical engineering expert system and its application[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,(8):1239-1242. |
null | Hu Jianhua, Guo Mengmeng, Zhou Tan,et al,2021.Rock mass quality evaluation model based on improved transfer learning algorithm[J].Gold Science and Technology,29(6):826-833. |
null | Jiang W, Wang Y C, Yang J G,et al,2023.Surrounding rock quality evaluation and application development for highway tunnel based on engineering applicability[J].Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,82(4):115. |
null | Kang Zhiqiang, Zhou Hui, Feng Xiating,et al,2007.Evaluation of high rock slope quality based on theory of extenics[J].Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science),(12):1770-1774. |
null | Li Chuiquan,2020.Quality Evaluation of Rock Mass and Stability Analysis of Surrounding Rock in Underground Space[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University of Science and Technology. |
null | Liang Guilan, Xu Weiya, Tan Xiaolong,2010.Application of extension theory based on entropy weight to rock quality evaluation[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,31(2):535-540. |
null | Liu Yanzhang, Sheng Jianlong, Ge Xiurun,et al,2007.Evaluation of rock mass quality based on fractal dimension of rock mass discontinuity distribution[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,(5):971-975. |
null | Liu Z X, Dang W G,2014.Rock quality classi?cation and stability evaluation of undersea deposit based on M-IRMR[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,40:95-101. |
null | Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China,2015. Standard for engineering classification of rock mass: [S].Beijing:China Planning Press. |
null | Qiu Daohong, Chen Jianping, Que Jinsheng,et al,2008.Evaluation of tunnel rock quality with routh sets theory and artificial neural networks[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),(1):86-91. |
null | Ruan Y K, Chen J Z, Fan Z M,et al,2023.Application of K-PSO clustering algorithm and game theory in rock mass quality evaluation of Maji hydropower station[J].Applied Sciences,13(14):8467. |
null | Salimi A, Rostami J, Moormann C,2019.Application of rock mass classification systems for performance estimation of rock TBMs using regression tree and artificial intelligence algorithms[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,92:103046. |
null | Xiao Yunhua, Wang Qing, Chen Jianping,2009.Application of method for weight calculation based on optimization technique to evaluate rock mass quality[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,30(9):2686-2690. |
null | Xu Xianfeng, Xing Pengfei, Wang Suihong,et al,2022.Rock mass quality evaluation and application based on game theory and G1-EW-TOPSIS method[J].Gold Science and Technology,30(5):704-712. |
null | Yin Huiyong, Zhao Han, Xu Lin,et al,2020.Classification of rock mass in mine based on improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J].Metal Mine,49(7):53-58. |
null | Zeng Taorui, Wang Linfeng, Weng Qineng,2019.Evaluation model of surrounding rock quality based on ideal point method and combination weighting[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Natural Science),33(10):79-85. |
null | Zhang Weizhong, Yuan Wei, Kang Qinrong,et al,2023.Quality evaluation of tunnel surrounding rock in karst area based on comprehensive weight-fuzzy matter-element method[J].Gold Science and Technology,31(3):487-496. |
null | Zhang Zhongting, Jing Feng, Yang Heli,2009.Practical Rock Mechanics for Engineering[M].Beijing:China Water Resources and Hydropower Press. |
null | Zhao Guoyan, Zhu Xubo, Su Long,et al,2012.Research on extension evaluation of rock quality for underground mine based on game theory[J].Mining Research and Development,32(1):12-16,54. |
null | Zhu Xubo,2012.Study of Underground Metal Mine Rock Quality Evaluation and Stope Structure Parameter Optimization[D].Changsha:Central South University. |
null | 曹琛,李会中,陈剑平,等,2017.基于组合赋权法与云模型坝基岩体质量评价[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),38(11):1643-1647. |
null | 曹文贵,张永杰,2006.地下结构岩体质量分类的变权重二级模糊综合评判方法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,25(8):1612-1618. |
null | 柴乃杰,周文梁,2023.基于优化组合权模糊可变集的坝基岩体质量分级[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),53(2):514-525. |
null | 陈俊池,2014.基于岩体质量分级的采场稳定性分析及支护技术研究[D].沈阳:东北大学. |
null | 陈懋,姚锡文,许开立,2022.基于 AHP-EWM-云模型的金属矿井突水危险性评价[J].有色金属工程,12(11):102-110. |
null | 郭彬,薛希龙,徐敏,2011.改进层次聚类法在矿山岩体分级中的应用[J].金属矿山,40(11):14-19. |
null | 贺怀建,白世伟,陈健,2002.岩土工程专家系统中的推理及其应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,21(8):1239-1242. |
null | 胡建华,郭萌萌,周坦,等,2021.基于改进迁移学习算法的岩体质量评价模型[J].黄金科学技术,29(6):826-833. |
null | 康志强,周辉,冯夏庭,等,2007.大型岩质边坡岩体质量的可拓学理论评价[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),28(12):1770-1774. |
null | 李垂泉,2020.地下空间岩体质量评价及围岩稳定性分析[D].南京:南京理工大学. |
null | 梁桂兰,徐卫亚,谈小龙,2010.基于熵权的可拓理论在岩体质量评价中的应用[J].岩土力学,31(2):535-540. |
null | 刘艳章,盛建龙,葛修润,等,2007.基于岩体结构面分布分形维的岩体质量评价[J].岩土力学,31(5):971-975. |
null | 邱道宏,陈剑平,阙金声,等,2008.基于粗糙集和人工神经网络的洞室岩体质量评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),38(1):86-91. |
null | 肖云华,王清,陈剑平,2009.基于优化技术的权重计算方法在岩体质量评价中的应用[J].岩土力学,30(9):2686-2690. |
null | 徐先锋,邢鹏飞,王岁红,等,2022.基于博弈论G1-EW-TOPSIS法的岩体质量评价和应用[J].黄金科学技术,30(5):704-712. |
null | 尹会永,赵涵,徐琳,等,2020.岩体质量分级的改进模糊综合评价法[J].金属矿山,49(7):53-58. |
null | 曾韬睿,王林峰,翁其能,2019.基于理想点法与组合赋权的围岩质量评价模型[J].重庆理工大学学报(自然科学),33(10):79-85. |
null | 张卫中,袁威,康钦容,等,2023.基于综合权重—模糊物元法的岩溶地区隧道围岩质量评价[J].黄金科学技术,31(3):487-496. |
null | 张忠亭,景锋,杨和礼,2009.工程实用岩石力学[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社. |
null | 赵国彦,朱旭波,苏龙,等,2012.基于博弈论的地下矿山岩体质量可拓评价研究[J].矿业研究与开发,32(1):12-16,54. |
null | 中华人民共和国水利部,2015. 工程岩体分级标准: [S].北京:中国计划出版社. |
null | 朱旭波,2012.地下金属矿岩体质量评价与采场结构参数优化研究[D].长沙:中南大学. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |