LIU Kewen, YU Qiqi, WANG Linke, XIAO Chen
The layout and development of metropolitan innovation and entrepreneurship space have attracted much attention from academia and government. This paper uses the methods of kernel density, spatial autocorrelation, and geographic detectors to analyze the layout evolution characteristics and formation mechanism of innovation and entrepreneurship space in three metropolitan areas (Shanghai, Nanjing, and Hangzhou) from 2010 to 2022, taking various enterprise incubation spaces above the municipal level as the main representation of innovation and entrepreneurship space. The results show: the overall structure of innovation and entrepreneurship space in Shanghai, Nanjing and Hangzhou is a "center-periphery" structure. Shanghai has changed from a polycentric pattern to a block-like configuration, Hangzhou has changed from a dual-core to a multi-corridor layout, and Nanjing has shifted from a multi-core to a multi-center cluster layout. The evolution of the spatial layout of metropolitan innovation and entrepreneurship space has experienced three stages: discrete layout in the initial stage, multi-core agglomeration in the middle stage, and multi-cluster in the later stage. Interactions among government, enterprises, landscape, and talent factors drive the formation and evolution of metropolitan innovation and entrepreneurship spatial layouts. Different factors, including policies from the government, finance of high-tech firms, industrial structure of the enterprise, leisure and medical amenities under the landscape factor, as well as universities, talent concentration, and patents, exert a comparatively stronger influence on the spatial organization of innovation and entrepreneurship. This paper thus puts forward suggestions such as promoting the complementarity of regional innovation resources and location advantages, giving full play to the "adhesive" and "development axes" role of transportation lines and landscape belts, integrating the characteristics of cities and regional functions, and strengthening the flexible guidance of policy and urban planning.