Review Article

Impact of green energy development on climate change mitigation

  • Kobiljon Khushvakht KHUSHVAKHTZODA , a, * ,
  • Ilkhom Burkhonovich MAKHSUMOV b ,
  • Muzaffar Boynazarovich KHOLNAZAROV a ,
  • Irina Mikhailovna KIRPICHNIKOVA c
Expand
  • aNational Academy of Sciences of Tajikistan, Dushanbe, 734018, Tajikistan
  • bTajik Power Engineering Institute, Department of Alternative Energy Sources, Kushoniyon, 735162, Tajikistan
  • cSouth Ural State University (National Research University), Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russian Federation
* E-mail address: (Kobiljon Khushvakht KHUSHVAKHTZODA).

Received date: 2025-08-29

  Revised date: 2025-12-03

  Accepted date: 2025-12-31

  Online published: 2026-03-11

Abstract

This study examined the role of green energy development in mitigating climate change and fostering sustainable development in Central Asia including Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan. The region has substantial untapped potential in solar energy, wind energy, hydropower energy, as well as biomass and bioenergy, positioning it strategically for renewable energy deployment. The result demonstrated that integrating renewable energy can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality, enhance energy security, and support rural development. Case studies from Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan showed measurable environmental and economic benefits. However, the large-scale use of renewable energy still faces numerous barriers, including outdated infrastructure, fragmented regulatory frameworks, limited investment, and shortages of technical expertise. Overcoming these obstacles requires institutional reform, stronger regional cooperation, and increasing engagement from international financial institutions and private investors. Modernizing grids, deploying storage systems, and investing in education, research, and innovation are critical for building human capacity in renewable energy sector. Accelerating the renewable energy transition is essential for Central Asia to meet climate goals, enhance environmental resilience, and ensure long-term socioeconomic development through innovation, investment, and regional collaboration.

Cite this article

Kobiljon Khushvakht KHUSHVAKHTZODA , Ilkhom Burkhonovich MAKHSUMOV , Muzaffar Boynazarovich KHOLNAZAROV , Irina Mikhailovna KIRPICHNIKOVA . Impact of green energy development on climate change mitigation[J]. Regional Sustainability, 2026 , 7(1) : 100292 . DOI: 10.1016/j.regsus.2026.100292

1. Introduction

Climate change is one of the major global challenges of the 21st century, with wide-ranging impacts on the environment, socioeconomic development, and public health. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2023), the global average temperature has risen by about 1.10°C relative to pre-industrial levels, leading to more frequent extreme weather events and the change of hydrological regime. Central Asia—comprising Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan—is highly vulnerable to climate change. Between 2010 and 2020, the region experienced a rise in the annual average temperature of approximately 0.30°C-0.50°C, along with shifts in precipitation patterns that have negatively affected water availability and agricultural productivity (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), 2021). These changes heighten the risks of land degradation, biodiversity loss, and social vulnerability. In response, regional governments and international partners are strengthening efforts to promote sustainable development and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Renewable energy plays a central role in global mitigation strategies. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA, 2024), large-scale deployment of renewable energy technologies could reduce carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from the energy sector by up to 70.0%.
Central Asia possesses substantial renewable energy resources. Annual average solar radiation ranges from 1.50×103 to 2.20×103 kW•h/m2, comparable to or higher than that of many European countries (Murodbek et al., 2022). Key wind corridors exhibit average speeds of 5-7 m/s, favorable for commercial wind power development. Mountainous regions of Central Asia also have water resources suitable for small- and medium-scale hydropower plants (World Bank, 2023a). However, the use of green energy is constrained by outdated energy infrastructure, limited investment, and legal and technical barriers (Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2023a). Table 1 shows renewable energy potential in Central Asia.
Table 1 Renewable resource potential in five Central Asian countries.
Country Solar radiation (×103 kW•h/(m2•a)) Average wind speed (m/s) Installed capacity of hydropower plant (×106 kW)
Kazakhstan 1.60-1.90 5-6 5.00
Uzbekistan 1.80-2.10 4-5 2.00
Kyrgyzstan 1.50-1.80 5-7 3.50
Tajikistan 1.60-2.00 4-6 6.00
Turkmenistan 2.00-2.20 4-5 1.50
During 1990-2024, the annual average temperature showed a steady increase of approximately 0.03°C/a in Central Asia (Fig. 1). This trend aligns with global and regional warming patterns and reflects the influence of greenhouse gas accumulation and shifts in regional atmospheric circulation, leading to a gradual intensification of heat stress. The annual average precipitation exhibited significant interannual variation. These fluctuations highlighted the sensitivity of the region’s hydrological cycle to natural climate change and anthropogenic factors. The data revealed two concurrent climatic trends in Central Asia: persistent warming and unstable but overall slowly increasing precipitation. These changes have direct impacts on water availability, agricultural productivity, and ecosystem resilience, underscoring the need for adaptive strategies in energy planning, water management, and food security (Su et al., 2024; World Meteorological Organization, 2025a).
Fig. 1. Annual precipitation and annual average temperature change trends in Central Asia during 1990-2024.
Finally, this study aims to achieving the following objectives: (1) assessing renewable energy potential and utilization; (2) analyzing the impact of renewable energy on emission reduction; (3) identifying key barriers and opportunities of the use of renewable energy; and (4) proposing recommendations for sustainable energy development in Central Asia.

2. Literature review

Central Asia’s arid and semi-arid ecosystems are highly vulnerable to climate change. Water resources, which are largely dependent on glacier melt and mountain precipitation, are facing significant threats. Therefore, understanding these dynamics is critical for regional socioeconomic stability and ecological sustainability. A substantial literature has thus focused on projecting future hydrological regimes under climate change.
Recent modeling studies provide insights into long-term trends of climate change. For example, Hou et al. (2025) projected that, despite declining snowmelt, the total discharge in the Amu Darya Basin will increase until mid-century because of intensifying glacier melt and increasing precipitation, and that streamflow seasonality and extremes will shift. Early work in Tianshan Mountains identified a mid-century ‘peak water’ followed by decline (Sorg et al., 2012), and a pattern was later confirmed in the Amu Darya and Syr Darya basins (Hagg et al., 2007) and has also been verified in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) scenarios in Tarim Basin (Guo et al., 2023) and Tianshan Mountains (Chen et al., 2017). At continental scale, the role of glacier melting in buffering droughts has also been emphasized (Pritchard, 2019). While these models are valuable for forecasting, many rely on coarse-resolution climate influencing factors that may not fully capture complex mountainous processes characteristics.
A parallel body of research (Liu et al., 2019; Qiao et al., 2019; Che et al., 2021) has used satellite observations to document hydrological and ecological responses to climate change in Central Asia. Some studies (Yang et al., 2020; Du et al., 2023; Deroin, 2025) have mapped glacier retreat and variations in lake surface area of Central Asia, providing essential evidence of ongoing environmental transformations. Building on these assessments, recent work has begun to elucidate the coupled behavior of landscape components. For example, studies by Abdouli et al. (2017), Aghahosseini et al. (2020), Albaker et al. (2023), and Su et al. (2025) showed strong synchronization between lake extent and surrounding vegetation, driven primarily by precipitation dynamics. These findings underscore the intrinsic linkage between hydrological and ecological systems in arid regions, with their interactions modulated by topography, groundwater connectivity, and other local factors (Alharthi et al., 2021; Ali and Bhuiyan, 2022; Al-Ismail et al., 2023; Al-Zubairi et al., 2025). However, despite their strengths in diagnosing past and present land-surface interactions, most of these studies (Humphrey et al., 2021; Xia et al., 2023) do not incorporate observed feedback mechanisms into forward-looking hydrological model projections.
This disconnect highlights a critical gap in the current research landscape. There is an urgent need to reconcile large-scale, forward-looking hydrological projections with the fine-scale, observation-based understanding of coupled land-water-atmosphere processes. In particular, it remains unclear how the complex interactions among surface water body, terrestrial ecosystem, and atmosphere identified by Su et al. (2024) will influence or be influenced by the broader hydrological changes projected in models such as those developed by Hou et al. (2025).
The present study evaluates the viability of Central Asia’s green energy potential in the context of rapidly evolving water resources. Therefore, this study integrated multi-source satellite observations with regional climate model outputs to identify future water-stress hotspots and assess their impacts on the long-term sustainability of proposed solar, wind, and hydropower developments. Through this approach, this study aims to provide a more holistic understanding of regional water and energy security and to inform prioritization and adaptation strategies that support a resilient renewable energy transition.

3. Materials and methods

This study used a mixed methodology that combines statistical analysis, comparative case study, and secondary literature to assess the role of renewable energy development under climate change mitigation in Central Asia.

3.1. Case study

We selected renewable energy projects in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan as case studies to illustrate the practical impacts of green energy utilization. A descriptive-comparative analysis follows the approaches summarized by Askarova et al. (2022) and Su et al. (2023). The case studies cover solar and wind energy farms, small hydropower plants, and biomass and bioenergy initiatives (Umam et al., 2025)

3.2. Data sources

This study analyzed Central Asia’s green energy transition using quantitative indicators obtained from major international databases during 2010-2023. Installed renewable energy capacity and electricity generation disaggregated by solar energy, wind energy, and hydropower were sourced from the IRENA (2023, 2024). Data on the Levelized Cost of Energy and annual investment in renewable energy were also drawn from the IRENA (2023, 2024). Macroeconomic context, including gross domestic product (GDP) and electricity access, was compiled from the World Bank (2023b). National energy strategies were reviewed to extract official 2030 renewable energy targets. Climatic data were characterized using the annual mean temperature and precipitation from the IPCC (2021) and World Meteorological Organization (2025b).

3.3. Methods

3.3.1. Assessment of renewable energy potential

Solar radiation, wind speed, and hydropower capacity indicators were compiled from regional assessments (UNECE, 2022a). Annual average solar insolation and wind speed were compared with European reference values from UNECE (2022b) and IRENA (2024). Hydropower capacity was estimated using the reported installed capacity and national energy development plans.

3.3.2. Evaluation of emission reduction

The contribution of renewable energy to greenhouse gas emission reduction was estimated using the emission factors from the IPCC (2023). For each country, a reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emission was calculated as follows:
ΔCO2=ERE×EFfossil,
where ΔCO2 represents a reduction in CO2 emission (t CO2); ERE is the electricity generated from renewable energy (103 kW•h); and EFfossil denotes the average emission factor of fossil-based electricity generation (t CO2/(103 kW•h)). Country-specific average emission factors were taken from the World Bank (2023b) and International Energy Agency (IRENA 2024).

3.3.3. Comparison and trend analysis method

Proportion of renewable energy in national energy structure of Central Asian countries was analyzed using the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) method, which is consistent with the established practices for tracking the use of renewable energy (REN21, 2023; BloombergNEF, 2024). Data visualizations and figures were generated using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, the USA) and OriginPro (Version 2024, OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, the USA) to ensure analytical rigor, clarity, and reproducibility.

3.3.4. Institutional review

National strategies and international cooperation mechanisms were analyzed through a qualitative document analysis framework (United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2022; UNECE, 2023). This study systematically reviewed government reports and publications from the UNDP, ADB, and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD, 2024a) to extract information on barriers, investment flows, and institutional reform agendas. Qualitative findings were triangulated with quantitative analyses to enhance robustness. Established methodologies (e.g., CAGR) were rigorously adapted to Central Asian’s context, with all deviations clearly documented and referenced.

4. Renewable energy potential in Central Asia

Central Asia has significant potential for developing various types of renewable energy sources, including solar energy, wind energy, hydropower, as well as biomass and bioenergy.

4.1. Solar energy

Annual average solar radiation in the region is high, typically 1.50×103-2.20×103 kW•h/m2, which provides favorable conditions for solar energy (ADB, 2023b). Solar power plants, both utility-scale and distributed, are developing rapidly in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Photovoltaic and solar thermal technologies diversify national energy structures and reduce greenhouse gas emissions (UNECE, 2022b). Central Asia is one of the most solar-rich regions in Eurasia. Ameur et al. (2022) reported that the annual duration of sunlight ranges from 2200 to 3000 h, which is sufficient to ensure adequate sunlight conditions.
Large solar projects have been launched, including “Noor Navis” in Uzbekistan and Samruk-Energy Solar “Burnoye” in Kazakhstan (Andriamahery and Qamruzzaman, 2022). Long-term power purchase agreements and auctions support the deployment of solar projects. Solar energy potential varies across Central Asian countries, including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan (Fig. 2). The northern and central regions of Kazakhstan show moderate solar energy potential, while the southern and southeastern regions of Kazakhstan (near the border with China) receive the highest levels of solar radiation, making these areas ideal for large-scale photovoltaic deployment. Kazakhstan’s solar energy potential is estimated at approximately 3.80×109 kW in 2022, which is the largest in Central Asia. Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan feature extensive high-irradiance zones, particularly across their southern and central deserts. Both countries have an annual solar energy potential of approximately 0.70×109-0.80×109 kW, indicating significant potential for large-scale solar projects. In Tajikistan, valleys and plateaus receive moderate-high solar radiation, while high-altitude regions benefit from stronger direct insolation due to reducing atmospheric attenuation, producing solar energy potential around 0.40×109 kW. Kyrgyzstan’s predominantly mountainous terrain results in a heterogeneous distribution of solar energy potential: valleys and lowland areas experience higher irradiance, while higher altitudes show lower solar energy potential, yielding an estimated total solar energy potential of approximately 0.05×109 kW.
Fig. 2. Solar energy potential in five Central Asian countries in 2022.
The analysis reveals a clear correlation between geographic features and solar energy potential. Arid and desert regions in the southern Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan offer optimal conditions for photovoltaic installations due to consistently high radiation and the minimal cloud cover. In contrast, mountainous regions, despite receiving strong direct sunlight, present infrastructural and logistical challenges that may limit large-scale deployment. Overall, Central Asia has a significant cumulative solar energy potential exceeding 5.00×109 kW, suggesting that large-scale photovoltaic projects are feasible in desert and plateau zones. Smaller, decentralized systems, however, are better suited for high-altitude and rugged terrains. This assessment provides a solid scientific basis for regional energy planning and integrating solar energy into sustainable energy strategies.

4.2. Wind energy

Wind energy in Central Asia is concentrated around Aral Sea, Ustyurt Plateau, and the mountainous corridors of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Average wind speed of 5-7 m/s is suitable for medium- and large-scale wind turbines (ADB, 2023a). Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are advancing wind power generation projects that not only create jobs, but also enhance grid stability. Regions such as Chambul and Aktobe in Kazakhstan experienced consistent wind flows averaging 5-7 m/s (Rahman et al., 2025). Notable projects include the “Yerymentou” wind farm and additional facilities in Akmola (Kazakhstan). In 2022, Uzbekistan signed agreements for the construction of wind power plants with a combined capacity of over 0.10×107 kW/a, supported by Masdar (2022) and the World Bank (2022).

4.3. Hydropower

Mountainous rivers offer significant potential for small- and medium-sized hydropower plants. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan have operated small hydropower stations that are crucial for local energy supply (FAO, 2024). Small-scale hydropower can reduce dependence on hydrocarbons and provide reliable local power. In Tajikistan, numerous mini-hydropower plants (with individual capacities reaching up to 0.10×105 kW/a) serve remote areas and help mitigate winter power shortages (Ministry of Energy of Tajikistan, 2023). Small hydropower projects generally have lower environmental impacts compared to large-scale plants and offer substantial social benefits.

4.4. Biomass and bioenergy

Biomass derived from agricultural residues, forest products, animal waste, and agro-industrial by-products represents a key component of the renewable energy potential in Central Asia, offering significant potential for heat and fuel production, particularly in rural and remote areas. The abundant availability of these resources allows for their sustainable exploitation, which can strengthen regional energy security, stimulate local economies, and promote the development of decentralized energy systems. Moreover, the utilization of biomass and bioenergy contributes to the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions, the reduction of environmental pollution, and the overall improvement of resource efficiency, supporting long-term sustainability goals in the region (World Bank, 2023c). Biomass use is currently limited but promising in agricultural lands, notably southern Kazakhstan and the Fergana valley (Askarova et al., 2022; World Resources Institute, 2024).

4.5. Proportion of renewable energy in the national energy structure

Figure 3 shows the percentage of renewable energy in the national energy structure of Central Asian countries during 2010-2024. The result illustrated notable differences among five Central Asian countries, reflecting both resource endowment and policy trajectories. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan have seen gradual increases in renewable energy since around 2015, following the integration of solar and wind energy projects. By 2024, renewable energy accounted for approximately 4.0%-5.0% of Kazakhstan’s energy structure and around 6.0% in Uzbekistan, driven by policy support and foreign investment. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, by contrast, maintained higher percentages of renewable energy, with renewable energy consistently making up more than 10.0% of their energy structure during 2010-2024. This is primarily due to their substantial hydropower potential, which has historically formed the backbone of their electricity generation. Although the growth rates of these countries appeared more moderate, the stability of their high percentages of renewable energy highlighted their structural dependence on hydropower (Government of Kazakhstan, 2021). In contrast, Turkmenistan lagged with a renewable energy percentage of just 2.0% until 2024. This slow pace of growth reflects the country’s ongoing dependence on fossil fuels and limited efforts to diversify its energy structure.
Fig. 3. Percentage of renewable energy in the national energy structure of Central Asian countries during 2010-2024.
Overall, Figure 3 illustrates the heterogeneous but generally upward trend of renewable energy development across five Central Asian countries. The trends suggested that hydropower-rich countries have maintained an energy structure based on renewable energy, while fossil-fuel-dominated economies are gradually transitioning toward renewable energy, albeit at varying speeds and scales. This dynamic emphasizes the need for regional cooperation and policy harmonization to expedite the transition to sustainable energy structure.
Finally, this study revealed significant disparities of renewable energy percentage among five Central Asian countries during 2010-2024 using the CAGR. Turkmenistan exhibited the highest growth rate of renewable energy (CAGR=18.3%), followed by Kazakhstan (CAGR=13.9%) and Uzbekistan (CAGR=12.1%). In contrast, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan showed much slower growth rate of renewable energy, with the CAGR values of 1.7% and 0.5%, respectively.

5. Role of renewable energy in climate change mitigation

5.1. Reducing greenhouse gas emission

The development of renewable energy is critical in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, which are the primary drivers of climate change. According to IRENA (2023), replacing fossil fuel with renewable energy could reduce CO2 emissions in the energy sector by 60.0%-80.0% by 2050, assuming widespread use of renewable energy (Zwally et al., 2002). In Central Asia, where a significant percentage of electricity is generated by coal- and gas-fired power plants, transitioning to renewable energy could substantially reduce the region’s carbon footprint. For example, solar and wind energy projects in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan have already reduce a large amount of CO2 emissions annually (Uzbekistan Ministry of Energy, 2023).

5.2. Decarbonization in the regional energy sector

Decarbonization, the process of reducing the carbon intensity of energy production, is a strategic priority for Central Asia. National strategies, such as Kazakhstan’s “Green Kazakhstan 2050” and Uzbekistan’s renewable energy sources development program, aim to raise renewable energy to roughly 30.0%-50.0% of the total energy structure during 2030-2040 (Lange et al., 2021; World Health Organization, 2021). These targets would reduce dependence on fossil fuels and strengthen energy independence. The United Nations and World Bank reports identify the use of renewable energy as one of the most effective pathways for meeting the climate goals of the Paris Agreement (United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2022).

5.3. Impact of renewable energy on air quality and ecosystem

The transition to renewable energy has a positive environmental impact by reducing air pollution and minimizing adverse effects on ecosystems. Fossil fuel combustion releases CO2, sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter, all of which degrade air quality and pose risks to human health (Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan Energy Ministries, 2022). The use of renewable energy helps improve the environmental quality, which is especially crucial for cities in Central Asia facing air pollution challenges. Additionally, the development of renewable energy reduces pressure on water resources and supports biodiversity conservation, which is vital for mountainous and prairie ecosystems in Central Asia (World Bank, 2023d).

6. Policy, investment, and international cooperation

6.1. National renewable energy strategies and programs

Central Asian countries have implemented national strategies and programs to promote the use of renewable energy and to facilitate the development of sustainable energy industries. Kazakhstan’s “Green Kazakhstan 2050” aims to achieve a 50.0% of renewable energy utilization by 2050 (ADB, 2023c). Uzbekistan’s National Renewable Energy Development Program supports large-scale solar and wind energy projects, alongside regulatory reforms (EBRD, 2024b). Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan focus on attracting investment in small-scale biomass and hydropower projects (Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan Energy Ministries, 2022; Albaker et al., 2023). These initiatives are designed to diversify energy systems, reduce environmental impacts, and enhance energy security.

6.2. Role of international organization and finance investment

International organizations are critical in supporting Central Asia’s energy transition. The World Bank, ADB, UNDP, and EBRD provide finance and technical assistance for renewable energy projects. For example, the ADB invested in establishing the “Zaskaragai” wind park in Kazakhstan, and the UNDP supported regulatory development and institutional capacity building (Masdar & Uzbek Ministry of Energy, 2023). Grants, concessional loans, and guarantees reduce financial risk and help attract private capital.

6.3. Investment trend and development barrier

Investment in regional renewable energy has grown steadily, and renewable energy’s percentage in national portfolios is gradually increasing (Baitanayeva et al., 2023). Nevertheless, several constraints limit large-scale development such as limited access to long-term finance, outdated technical equipment, complex administrative procedures, and shortages of qualified personnel (Masdar, 2022). Grid infrastructure also requires upgrades to integrate variable energy sources. Therefore, it is necessary to implement relevant reform measures to increase regulatory transparency, simplify the approval process, improve grid regulations, and strengthen international cooperation. There is an interactive relationship between countries and international organizations in the development of renewable energy.
Figure 4 summarizes the number of investment projects and investment volume of the selected renewable energy (solar energy, wind energy, hydropower, as well as biomass and bioenergy) across five Central Asian countries during 2022‒2024. The data revealed substantial changes in both investment projects and investment volume of the selected renewable energy across five countries. Kazakhstan led with 47 projects and the highest investment volume of 47.92×109 USD, underscoring its dominant role in regional renewable energy development. Uzbekistan followed with 29 projects and 25.00×109 USD in investment volume. Despite having a moderate number of projects (23), Kyrgyzstan had a comparatively lower investment volume of 18.87×109 USD. Tajikistan had 15 projects and 6.67×109 USD in investment volume. Turkmenistan showed relatively lower activity, with four projects and the investment volume of 1.17×109 USD. These results illustrate both the correlation between the number of investment projects and investment volume, as well as pronounced disparities in investment intensity across the region.
Fig. 4. Number of investment project and investment volume of five Central Asian countries during 2022‒2024.

7. Discussion

This study demonstrated that Central Asia has substantial technical potential for diverse renewable energy sources. Solar energy, wind energy, hydropower, as well as biomass and bioenergy have contributed to reducing greenhouse gas emission and improving local environmental quality. These results highlight both the opportunities and systemic constraints that influence the pace and scale of renewable energy transition in five Central Asia countries including Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan.
The increases of renewable energy utilization and the reduction of emissions are significant for three interrelated reasons. First, even a modest increase in renewable energy can observably reduce emissions in systems where a large percentage of electricity still comes from fossil fuels. This is explained by the generation displacement principle: renewable energy reduces the operating hours of fossil fuel generators during overlapping demand periods, thereby lowering net CO2 emissions. The macro-level reductions (Tables 1 and 2) reflect both installed capacity and effective utilization, including capacity factors and grid integration (Kristensen et al., 2023). Second, country heterogeneity demonstrates that resource endowment alone does not guarantee climate change mitigation. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan maintain high percentages of renewable energy from hydropower, while Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan are still transitioning to solar and wind energies. Institutional frameworks, financing mechanisms, and grid readiness ultimately determine whether renewable energy mitigation potential is realized in actual mitigation. As such, policy responses must be tailored: auctions and standardized power purchase agreements may be the most effective in fossil-fuel-dominant systems, while hydro-dominated systems may require rehabilitation programs and strengthened environmental safeguards (IEA, 2024a,b). Third, co-benefits, such as the improvement of air quality, rural electrification, and job creation, strengthen the socio-political case for renewable energy. These non-carbon benefits can accelerate political support and attract financing beyond traditional carbon accounting. Future research should explicitly quantify these co-benefits to enhance cost-benefit and distributive impact assessments.
Table 2 Reduction of CO2 emissions in five Central Asian countries due to the use of renewable energy during 2020-2024.
Year Reduction of CO2 emissions (t CO2/a)
Kazakhstan Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan
2020 2.1 1.5 0.8 0.9 0.4
2021 3.0 2.1 1.0 1.1 0.6
2022 4.2 3.0 1.2 1.3 0.9
2023 5.1 4.0 1.4 1.5 1.2
2024 6.0 5.2 1.6 1.7 1.5
The primary technical mechanism for reducing emissions is generation displacement. The magnitude of avoided emissions depends on three technical and systemic factors: (i) the marginal emission factor of the displaced fossil unit(s); (ii) the capacity factor and temporal generation profile of renewable installation; and (iii) the extent of curtailment and grid constraints. In hydro-dominated systems, managing variability may depend more on hydro scheduling than on fossil-fired backup, which affects the emission outcome of added renewable energy. These mechanisms should be explicitly modeled when translating capacity additions into avoided emissions, as using average national emission factors without sensitivity testing can lead to inaccurate estimations (Prindle, 2009; Mehta, 2023; International Hydropower Association, 2024).
This study identifies key systemic barriers in the use of renewable energy: outdated infrastructure, fragmented regulatory frameworks, limited investment, and shortages of technical expertise. Operational constraints, such as grid rigidity, limited interconnection capacity, and the lack of transparent, bankable procurement procedures, explain why Central Asian’s renewable energy potential remains underexploited. Weak grid codes and uncertain tariff regimes further amplify perceived investment risks.
A coherent policy package is essential to accelerate the transition and maximize climate benefits. Transparent competitive procurement (auctions), standardized power purchase agreements, and guaranteed off-takers can reduce investors’ risk. Investments in transmission, cross-border interconnections, demand-side management, and storage can reduce curtailment and facilitate higher percentages of variable renewable energy. Blended finance, guarantees, and concessional loans for the first batch of projects in underserved regions can catalyze private capital. Workforce training, university-industry partnerships, and pilot projects for hybrid systems (e.g., solar-plus-storage and hydro-wind hybrids) can build operational experience.
This study primarily relies on nationally aggregated statistics, specifically the annual average emission factors, reported installed capacities of power generation technologies, and average capacity factors derived from national energy reports. However, the quantification of avoided emissions would be more robust if complemented by hourly power system dispatch modeling using marginal emission factors, which capture temporal substitution effects between generation technologies. Future studies should also present uncertainty ranges reflecting variability in emission factor selection, capacity factor assumptions, and renewable energy curtailment rates, and should expand socioeconomic assessments to include Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) trajectories, employment multipliers, and distributional (equity) impacts (Brinkmann et al., 2018).

8. Conclusions and recommendations

The development of green energy in Central Asia is both an environmental imperative and a strategic driver of sustainable economic growth, energy security, and social development. The region’s solar energy, wind energy, hydropower, as well as biomass and bioenergy, if effectively utilized, can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality, expand rural electrification, and create new employment opportunities. Progress is evident in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, where utility-scale solar and wind power projects are expanding, while Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan continue to rely heavily on hydropower.
However, persistent challenges—outdated infrastructure, fragmented regulatory frameworks, limited investment, and shortages of technical expertise—reduce the pace of the transition from fossil fuel to renewable energy. Therefore, Central Asian countries should strengthen institutional and regulatory frameworks to ensure transparent, stable, and investor-friendly conditions. Enhancing regional cooperation can foster policy harmonization, cross-border electricity trade, and progress toward a unified green energy market. It is essential to mobilize finance from international development banks, climate funds, and private capital, alongside upgrading infrastructure with smart grids and storage technologies to better integrate variable renewable energy.
Capacity-building initiatives in education, vocational training, and research are crucial for developing the human capital necessary to support technological progress. Innovation in bioenergy, geothermal resources, and hybrid systems should be fostered to diversify renewable energy structure. Priority should be given to projects that deliver clear environmental and social benefits, such as the improvement of air quality, biodiversity conservation, rural development, and the increase of local quality of life. In summary, accelerating renewable energy utilization in Central Asia will help countries meet national climate targets and international commitments, while fostering a more resilient, sustainable, and prosperous future for Central Asia.

Authorship contribution statement

Kobiljon Khushvakht KHUSHVAKHTZODA: formal analysis, methodology, writing - original draft, and writing - review & editing; Ilkhom Burkhonovich MAKHSUMOV: supervision, validation, and writing - review & editing; Muzaffar Boynazarovich KHOLNAZAROV: data curation, investigation, resources, and visualization; and Irina Mikhailovna KIRPICHNIKOVA: conceptualization, resources, supervision, and writing - review & editing. All authors approved the manuscript.

Declaration of conflict of interest

Kobiljon Khushvakht KHUSHVAKHTZODA is an Editorial Board member of Regional Sustainability and a Guest Editor-in-Chief of the Special Issue “Green Sustainability in Tajikistan: Bridging Science, Policy, and Community Action” of Regional Sustainability, and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the National Academy of Sciences of Tajikistan for its support. We are also indebted to our colleagues at the Tajik Power Engineering Institute and South Ural State University for their insightful discussions and collaboration on this manuscript.
[1]
Abdouli M., Hammami S., 2017. Economic growth, FDI inflows and their impact on the environment: An empirical study for the MENA countries. Quality & Quantity. 51(1), 121-146.

[2]
ADB(Asian Development Bank), 2023a. Barriers to Renewable Energy Deployment in Central Asia. [2025-07-22]. https://www.ppa.org.fj/asian-development-bank-increasing-access-to-renewable-energy-project/.

[3]
ADB, 2023b. Central Asia Clean Energy Initiatives. [2025-07-22]. https://www.adb.org/news/events/asia-clean-energy-forum-2023.

[4]
ADB, 2023c. Wind Energy Development in Central Asia. [2025-07-22]. https://kun.uz/en/news/2023/04/25/adb-and-acwa-power-sign-deal-for-two-utility-scale-wind-power-plants-in-uzbekistan.

[5]
Aghahosseini A., Bogdanov D., Breyer C., 2020. Towards sustainable development in the MENA region: Analysing the feasibility of a 100% renewable electricity system in 2030. Energy Strategy Reviews. 28, 100466, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100466.

[6]
Albaker A., Abbasi K.R., Haddad A.M., et al., 2023. Analyzing the impact of renewable energy and green innovation on carbon emissions in the MENA region. Energies. 16(16), 6053, doi: 10.3390/en16166053.

[7]
Alharthi M., Dogan E., Taskin D., 2021. Analysis of CO2 emissions and energy consumption by sources in MENA countries: Evidence from quantile regressions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(29), 38901-38908.

DOI

[8]
Ali H.E., Bhuiyan S., 2022. Governance, natural resources rent, and infrastructure development: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa. Politics Policy. 50(2), 408-440.

DOI

[9]
Al-Ismail F.S., Alam M.S., Shafiullah M., et al., 2023. Impacts of renewable energy generation on greenhouse gas emissions in Saudi Arabia: A comprehensive review. Sustainability. 15(6), 5069, doi: 10.3390/su15065069.

[10]
Al-Zubairi A., AL-Akheli A., ELfarra B., 2025. The impact of financial development, renewable energy and political stability on carbon emissions: Sustainable development prospective for arab economies. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 27, 15251-15273.

DOI

[11]
Ameur H.B., Han X.Y., Liu Z.Y., et al., 2022. When did global warming start? A new baseline for carbon budgeting. Economic Modelling. 116, 106005, doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106005.

[12]
Andriamahery A., Qamruzzaman M., 2022. A symmetry and asymmetry investigation of the nexus between environmental sustainability, renewable energy, energy innovation, and trade: Evidence from environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in selected MENA countries. Frontiers in Energy Research. 9, 778202, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.778202.

[13]
Askarova A., Zamorano M., Martín-Pascual J., et al., 2022. A review of the energy potential of residual biomass for coincineration in Kazakhstan. Energies. 15(17), 6482, doi: 10.3390/en15176482.

[14]
Baitanayeva B., Yerezhepova A., Andabayeva G., 2023. Development of renewable energy in Kazakhstan based on global trends. Environmental Science, Economics, Engineering. 2(3), 69-83.

[15]
BloombergNEF, 2024. Investment Trends in Global Renewable Energy. New York: BloombergNEF.

[16]
Brinkmann T., Both R., Scalet B.M., et al., 2018. JRC Reference Report on Monitoring of Emissions to Air and Water from IED Installations. Seville: European Commission.

[17]
Che X.H., Feng M., Sun Q., et al., 2021. The decrease in lake numbers and areas in Central Asia investigated using a Landsat-derived water dataset. Remote Sensing. 13(5), 1032, doi: 10.3390/rs13051032.

[18]
Chen Y.N., Li Z., Fang G., et al., 2017. Impact of climate change on water resources in the Tianshan Mountains, Central Asia. Acta Geographica Sinica. 72(01),21/dlxb201701002 (in Chinese).

[19]
Deroin J.P., 2025. Use of remote sensing data to study the Aral Sea Basin in Central Asia—geoscience and geological hazards. Remote Sensing. 17(6), 2814, doi: 10.3390/rs17162814.

[20]
Du W.B., Pan Y.M., Li J.L., et al., 2023. Glacier retreat leads to the expansion of Alpine Lake Karakul observed via remote sensing water volume time series reconstruction. Atmosphere. 14(2), 1772, doi: 10.3390/atmos14121772.

[21]
EBRD(European Bank for Reconstruction and Development) , 2024a. Barriers to Renewable Energy Deployment in Central Asia. London: EBRD.

[22]
EBRD, 2024b. We Invest in Changing Lives. London: EBRD.

[23]
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2024. Supported by GEF, Launches Projects to Transform Central Asian Agriculture. Rome: FAO.

[24]
Guo X.Y., Fang G.H., Chen Y.N., et al., 2023. Analysis of runoff variations in an arid catchment based on multi-model ensemble- a case study in the Tarim River Basin in Central Asia. Frontiers in Earth Science. 11, 1249107.doi:10.3389/feart.2023.1249107.

[25]
Government of Kazakhstan, 2021. Green Kazakhstan Strategy 2050. [2025-07-15]. https://2021.page-annual-report.org/country-report/2021-kazakhstan/.

[26]
Hagg W., Braun L.N., Kuhn M., et al., 2007. Modelling of hydrological response to climate change in glacierized Central Asian catchments. Journal of Hydrology. 332(1-2), 40-53.

DOI

[27]
Hou M., Cuo L., Xu H.H., 2025. Hydrological response to twenty-first century climate change in the Amu Darya Basin, Central Asia. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 61, 102606, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102606.

[28]
Humphrey V., Berg A., Ciais P., et al., 2021. Soil moisture-atmosphere feedback dominates land carbon uptake variability. Nature. 592, 65-69.

DOI

[29]
IEA(International Energy Agency) , 2024a. Energy Transitions and Climate Strategies in Emerging Economies. Paris: IEA.

[30]
IEA, 2024b. The Global Power Mix Is Set to Transform by 2030. Paris: IEA.

[31]
International Hydropower Association, 2024. Hydropower in South and Central Asia. South and Central Asia Regional Overview and Outlook. London: International Hydropower Association.

[32]
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Geneva: IPCC.

[33]
IPCC, 2023. Climate Change 2023:Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.

[34]
IRENA(International Renewable Energy Agency), 2023. Renewable Energy and Climate Change Mitigation. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.

[35]
IRENA, 2024. Renewable Energy and Climate Change Mitigation. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.

[36]
Kristensen J., Slomka M., Shamsi S., 2023. Economic and Financial Issues in Renewable Energy Arbitration. [2025-06-22]. https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-european-arbitration-review/2023/article/economic-and-financial-issues-in-renewable-energy-arbitration.

[37]
Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan Energy Ministries, 2022. National Energy Development Plans. [2025-07-12]. https://timesca.com/kyrgyzstan-plans-to-export-electricity-to-pakistan-next-year/.

[38]
Lange S., Menz C., Gleixner S., et al., 2021. WFDE 5 over Land Merged with ERA5 over the Ocean (W5E5 v2.0). [2025-07-22]. https://b2find.eudat.eu/dataset/e0eb4476-e544-5dc4-953b-0e89d5df7c4d.

[39]
Liu H.J., Chen Y.N., Ye Z.X., et al., 2019. Recent Lake Area Changes in Central Asia. Scientific Reports. 9, 16277, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52396-y.

PMID

[40]
Masdar, 2022. Uzbekistan Wind Projects. [2025-06-10]. https://masdar.ae/en/news/newsroom/masdar-achieves-financial-close-on-uzbekistans.

[41]
Masdar & Uzbek Ministry of Energy, 2023. Project Portfolio Overview. [2025-06-12]. https://masdar.ae/en/news/newsroom/masdar-signs-agreement-to-develop-1gw-mingbulak-wind-farm-in-uzbekistan.

[42]
Mehta K., 2023. Energy Situation in Central Asia. [2025-06-20]. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/12547.

[43]
Ministry of Energy of Tajikistan, 2023. Development of Small Hydropower in Mountain Regions. Dushanbe: Ministry of Energy of Tajikistan.

[44]
Murodbek L., Ruslan I., Almaz A., 2022. Renewable Energy in Central Asia: Potential, Use, Outlook, and Barriers. Bishkek: University of Central Asia.

[45]
Prindle W., 2009. National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency. Energy Efficiency as A Low-Cost Resource for Achieving Carbon Emissions Reductions. [2025-07-22]. https://www.epa.gov/eeactionplan.

[46]
Pritchard H.D., 2019. Asia’s shrinking glaciers protect large populations from drought stress. Nature. 569(7758), 649-654.

DOI

[47]
Qiao B.J., Zhu L.P., Yang R.M., 2019. Temporal-spatial differences in lake water storage changes and their links to climate change throughout the Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sensing of Environment. 222, 232-242.

DOI

[48]
Rahman S.M., Raihan A., Alam M.S., et al., 2025. Greenhouse gas emission dynamics and climate change mitigation efforts toward sustainability in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Regional Sustainability. 6(4), 100246, doi: 10.1016/j.regsus.2025.100246.

[49]
REN21(Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century), 2023. Renewables Global Futures Report. [2025-07-22]. https://www.ren21.net/gsr-2023/.

[50]
Sorg A., Bolch T., Stoffel M., et al., 2012. Climate change impacts on glaciers and runoff in Tian Shan (Central Asia). Nature Climate Change. 2(10), 725-731.

DOI

[51]
Su F., Liu Y., Chen L.F., et al., 2024. Impact of climate change on food security in the Central Asian countries. Science China Earth Sciences. 67, 268-280.

DOI

[52]
Su J.L., Lu Y., Pan S.F., et al., 2023. Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding. Computation and Language. 568, 127063, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2104.09864.

[53]
Su Y.A., Chen S.Q., Li X., et al., 2025. Synchronized lake-vegetation dynamics under climate change in arid central Asia. Science Bulletin. 70(22), 3695-3697.

DOI

[54]
Umam M.F., Patria M.F.A., Affandi D.M., et al., 2025. Performance evaluation of 120 kWp on-grid photovoltaic power plants after five years of operation. Indonesian Journal of Energy. 8(2), 177-189.

DOI

[55]
UNDP United Nations Development Programme, 2022. Supporting Green Energy Transition in Central Asia. New York: UNDP.

[56]
UNECE(United Nations Economic Commission for Europe), 2021. Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in Central Asia. Geneva: UNECE.

[57]
UNECE, 2022a. Solar Energy Potential in Central Asia. Geneva: UNECE.

[58]
UNECE, 2022b. UNECE Annual Report 2022. Geneva: UNECE.

[59]
UNECE, 2023. Renewable Energy Readiness in Central Asia. Geneva: UNECE.

[60]
UNEP(United Nations Environment Programme), 2022. Environmental Benefits of Renewable Energy. Nairobi: UNEP.

[61]
Uzbekistan Ministry of Energy, 2023. Renewable Energy Development Plan. [2025-07-22]. https://euroconventionglobal.com/event/renpower-uzbekistan-2023/.

[62]
World Bank, 2022. Central Asia Water and Energy Program: Annual Report 2021. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

[63]
World Bank, 2023a. Central Asia Energy Sector Overview. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

[64]
World Bank, 2023b. Central Asia Energy Forum Discusses Prospects for the Regional Electricity Market Development and Clean Energy Transition. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

[65]
World Bank, 2023c. Energy Transition in Kazakhstan Back to the Sustainable Future. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

[66]
World Bank, 2023d. Financing Renewable Energy in Central Asia. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

[67]
World Health Organization, 2021. Air Quality and Health in Central Asia. Geneva: World Health Organization.

[68]
World Meteorological Organization, 2025a. . Global Annual to Decadal Climate Update (2025-2029). Geneva: World Health Organization.

[69]
World Meteorological Organization, 2025b. Rising Temperatures and Extreme Weather Hit Asia Hard. Geneva: World Health Organization.

[70]
World Resources Institute, 2024. Investment and Infrastructure Challenges in Renewable Energy. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.

[71]
Xia Q., Fan Y.Z., Zhang H.R., et al., 2023. A review on the development of two-way coupled atmospheric-hydrological models. Sustainability. 15(3), 2803, doi: 10.3390/su15032803.

[72]
Yang X.W., Wang N., Chen A.A., et al., 2020. Changes in area and water volume of the Aral Sea in the arid Central Asia over the period of 1960-2018 and their causes. CATENA. 191, 104566, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104566.

[73]
Zwally H.J., Schutz B., Abdalati W., et al., 2002. ICESat’s laser measurements of polar ice, atmosphere, ocean, and land. Journal of Geodynamics. 34(3-4), 405-445.

DOI

Outlines

/